Web Information Seeking and Interaction

[1]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[2]  David Ellis,et al.  A Comparison of the Information seeking Patterns of researchers in the Physical and Social Sciences , 1993, J. Documentation.

[3]  Micheline Beaulieu.  Interaction in information searching and retrieval , 2000, J. Documentation.

[4]  Tara Brabazon.  BA (Google) : graduating to information literacy , 2005 .

[5]  Feifei Li,et al.  Towards building logical views of websites , 2004, Data Knowl. Eng..

[6]  Andrea Lockerd Thomaz,et al.  Cheese: tracking mouse movement activity on websites, a tool for user modeling , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Seeking Meaning: a process approach to library and information services" Ablex Publishing , 2003 .

[8]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau.  Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. , 1991 .

[9]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[10]  Pia Borlund,et al.  Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2000, J. Documentation.

[11]  U. Konradt,et al.  The Experience of Flow in Interacting With a Hypermedia Learning Environment , 2001 .

[12]  Jaime Teevan,et al.  The Re:Search Engine Helping People Return to Information on the Web , 2005 .

[13]  M. Privitera.  What Is Ease of Use? , 2005 .

[14]  Anton Leuski,et al.  Evaluating document clustering for interactive information retrieval , 2001, CIKM '01.

[15]  Taher H. Haveliwala.  Topic-sensitive PageRank , 2002, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[16]  Charles L. A. Clarke,et al.  Modeling task-genre relationships for IR in the workplace , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[17]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  Optimizing web search using web click-through data , 2004, CIKM '04.

[18]  Pamela Madsen,et al.  Just the facts, ma'am: coming clean about fertility , 2003 .

[19]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From Ellis's model to design , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  Carol L. Barry.  User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study , 1994 .

[21]  Päivi Majaranta,et al.  Eye-Tracking Reveals the Personal Styles for Search Result Evaluation , 2005, INTERACT.

[22]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Regions and levels: Measuring and mapping users' relevance judgments , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  John R. Anderson,et al.  What can a mouse cursor tell us more?: correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[24]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Knowing the User's Every Move – User Activity Tracking for Website Usability Evaluation and Implicit Interaction , 2006 .

[25]  ChengXiang Zhai,et al.  Implicit user modeling for personalized search , 2005, CIKM '05.

[26]  James Allan,et al.  Using similarity links as shortcuts to relevant web pages , 2007, SIGIR.

[27]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Characteristics of Texts Affecting Relevance Judgments , 1993 .

[28]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Peter Willett,et al.  Using interdocument similarity information in document retrieval systems , 1997 .

[30]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[31]  Ke Wang,et al.  Privacy-enhancing personalized web search , 2007, WWW '07.

[32]  Yoshinori Hijikata,et al.  Implicit user profiling for on demand relevance feedback , 2004, IUI '04.

[33]  S. P. Harter.  Psychological relevance and information science , 1992 .

[34]  Mark D. Dunlop,et al.  A calendar based Internet content pre-caching agent for small computing devices , 2008, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[35]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Implicit interest indicators , 2001, IUI '01.

[36]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Information interaction: Providing a framework for information architecture , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  Report on the need for and provision of an 'ideal' information retrieval test collection , 1975 .

[38]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface , 1989 .

[39]  William S. Cooper,et al.  On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[40]  James Allan,et al.  Find-similar: similarity browsing as a search tool , 2006, SIGIR.

[41]  Diane Kelly,et al.  IMPLICIT FEEDBACK: USING BEHAVIOR TO INFER RELEVANCE , 2005 .

[42]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[43]  Pia Borlund,et al.  The IIR evaluation model: a framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 2003, Inf. Res..

[44]  Jean Tague-Sutcliffe,et al.  Some measures and procedures for evaluation of the user interface in an information retrieval system , 1988, SIGIR '88.

[45]  Jane Webster,et al.  Enhancing the Design of Web Navigation Systems: The Influence of User Disorientation on Engagement and Performance , 2006, MIS Q..

[46]  Ryen W. White,et al.  A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[47]  Ellen M. Vdorhees.  The cluster hypothesis revisited , 1985, SIGIR 1985.

[48]  J. J. Rocchio,et al.  Relevance feedback in information retrieval , 1971 .

[49]  George M. Chryssochoidis.  Findings and Discussion , 2004 .

[50]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Relationships between categories of relevance criteria and stage in task completion , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[51]  Peter Pirolli,et al.  Information foraging theory , 2007 .

[52]  Joemon M. Jose,et al.  How users assess Web pages for information seeking , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[53]  Klaus Nordhausen,et al.  Modeling successful performance in Web searching , 2006 .

[54]  Anne Aula,et al.  Studying user strategies and characteristics for developing web search interfaces , 2005 .

[55]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[56]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[57]  Marc M. Sebrechts,et al.  Visualization of search results: a comparative evaluation of text, 2D, and 3D interfaces , 1999, SIGIR '99.

[58]  D. Grant Campbell,et al.  "I still like Google": University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web , 2005, ASIST.

[59]  Andrew Turpin,et al.  Challenging conventional assumptions of automated information retrieval with real users: Boolean searching and batch retrieval evaluations , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..

[60]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[61]  Andreas Paepcke,et al.  The digital library integrated task environment (DLITE) , 1997, DL '97.

[62]  Wee Sun Lee,et al.  Using link analysis to improve layout on mobile devices , 2004, WWW '04.

[63]  Ji-Rong Wen,et al.  WWW 2007 / Track: Search Session: Personalization A Largescale Evaluation and Analysis of Personalized Search Strategies ABSTRACT , 2022 .

[64]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment , 1999, SODA '98.

[65]  ChengXiang Zhai,et al.  Mining long-term search history to improve search accuracy , 2006, KDD '06.

[66]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[67]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[68]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research , 2001 .

[69]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Personalizing Search via Automated Analysis of Interests and Activities , 2005, SIGIR.

[70]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[71]  Falk Scholer,et al.  User performance versus precision measures for simple search tasks , 2006, SIGIR.

[72]  Peter Williams,et al.  Re-appraising information seeking behaviour in a digital environment: Bouncers, checkers, returnees and the like , 2004, J. Documentation.

[73]  David Benyon,et al.  The Role of Task Analysis in Systems Design , 1992, Interact. Comput..

[74]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[75]  Amanda Spink.  Study of interactive feedback during mediated information retrieval , 1997 .

[76]  Tefko Saracevic,et al.  The Stratified Model of Information Retrieval Interaction: Extension and Applications , 1997 .

[77]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces , 2001, CSUR.

[78]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[79]  James Allan,et al.  HARD Track Overview in TREC 2003: High Accuracy Retrieval from Documents , 2003, TREC.

[80]  Marti A. Hearst.  TileBars: visualization of term distribution information in full text information access , 1995, CHI '95.

[81]  Thomas Roelleke.  A frequency-based and a poisson-based definition of the probability of being informative , 2003, SIGIR '03.

[82]  José Luis Vicedo González,et al.  TREC: Experiment and evaluation in information retrieval , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[83]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  The Role of Mouse Movements in Interactive Search , 2006 .

[84]  Abraham Bookstein,et al.  Information retrieval: A sequential learning process , 1983, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[85]  Anita Komlodi,et al.  Attorneys interacting with legal information systems: Tools for mental model building and task integration , 2005, ASIST.

[86]  Harri Siirtola,et al.  Hundreds of Folders or One Ugly Pile - Strategies for Information Search and Re-access , 2005, INTERACT.

[87]  Rong Tang,et al.  Towards the Identification of the Optimal Number of Relevance Categories , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[88]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Searching the Web: the public and their queries , 2001 .

[89]  Anne Aula,et al.  Query Formulation in Web Information Search , 2003, ICWI.

[90]  Iain Campbell,et al.  Interactive Evaluation of the Ostensive Model Using a New Test Collection of Images with Multiple Relevance Assessments , 2000, Information Retrieval.

[91]  Andrew Turpin,et al.  Why batch and user evaluations do not give the same results , 2001, SIGIR '01.

[92]  Shumeet Baluja,et al.  A large scale study of wireless search behavior: Google mobile search , 2006, CHI.

[93]  Hayato Yamana,et al.  Overview of the NTCIR-5 WEB Navigational Retrieval Subtask 2 (Navi-2) , 2005, NTCIR.

[94]  Steve Fox,et al.  Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search , 2005, TOIS.

[95]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  The use of hierarchic clustering in information retrieval , 1971, Inf. Storage Retr..

[96]  Michael B. Eisenberg.  Measuring relevance judgments , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[97]  K. Sparck Jones,et al.  A TEST FOR THE SEPARATION OF RELEVANT AND NON‐RELEVANT DOCUMENTS IN EXPERIMENTAL RETRIEVAL COLLECTIONS , 1973 .

[98]  Daniel E. Rose,et al.  Understanding user goals in web search , 2004, WWW '04.

[99]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information as Thing , 1991 .

[100]  Richard L. Derr.  The concept of information in ordinary discourse , 1985, Inf. Process. Manag..

[101]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems , 2003, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[102]  Lei Wen,et al.  The Effects on Topic Familiarity on Online Search Behaviour and Use of Relevance Criteria , 2006, ECIR.

[103]  David Salesin,et al.  Summarizing personal web browsing sessions , 2006, UIST.

[104]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search , 2004, CHI.

[105]  Amanda Spink,et al.  New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval , 2005 .

[106]  Moni Naor,et al.  Rank aggregation methods for the Web , 2001, WWW '01.

[107]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  Using ODP metadata to personalize search , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[108]  Monika Henzinger,et al.  Analysis of a very large web search engine query log , 1999, SIGF.

[109]  Jean Tague.  Informativeness as an ordinal utility function for information retrieval , 1987, SIGIR 1987.

[110]  Alistair Moffat,et al.  Some Observations on User Search Behaviour , 2006, Aust. J. Intell. Inf. Process. Syst..

[111]  J. B. Kernan,et al.  On the Meaning of Leisure: An Investigation of Some Determinants of the Subjective Experience , 1983 .

[112]  Valerie L. Shalin,et al.  Cognitive task analysis , 2000 .

[113]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[114]  Ping Zhang,et al.  A person-artefact-task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[115]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Combining Multiple Forms of Evidence While Filtering , 2005, HLT.

[116]  Carol L. Barry,et al.  Order Effects: A Study of the Possible Influence of Presentation Order on User Judgments of Document Relevance. , 1988 .

[117]  Mika Käki,et al.  Less is more in Web search interfaces for older adults , 2005, First Monday.

[118]  Brenda Dervin,et al.  On studying information seeking methodologically: the implications of connecting metatheory to method , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[119]  Jean Tague-Sutcliffe.  Measuring the informativeness of a retrieval process , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[120]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[121]  Yuka Egusa,et al.  An Application of the NTCIR-WEB Raw-data Archive Dataset for User Experiments , 2007, EVIA@NTCIR.

[122]  Fidel Cacheda,et al.  Understanding how people use search engines: a statistical analysis for e-Business , 2000 .

[123]  Minoru Nakayama,et al.  The response of eye-movement and pupil size to audio instruction while viewing a moving target , 2000, ETRA.

[124]  David R. Karger,et al.  Less is More Probabilistic Models for Retrieving Fewer Relevant Documents , 2006 .

[125]  Stephen A. Osiobe,et al.  Information seeking behaviour , 1988 .

[126]  Frances C. Johnson,et al.  Using the repertory grid and laddering technique to determine the user's evaluative model of search engines , 2007, J. Documentation.

[127]  Mika Käki,et al.  Information search and re-access strategies of experienced web users , 2005, WWW '05.

[128]  Isola Ajiferuke,et al.  A total relevance and document interaction effects model for the evaluation of information retrieval processes , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[129]  Ernesto Arroyo,et al.  Usability tool for analysis of web designs using mouse tracks , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[130]  Ian Soboroff,et al.  Overview of the TREC 2004 Novelty Track , 2004, TREC.

[131]  G. Ringel,et al.  PEARLS in GRAPH THEORY , 2007 .