A relaxation algorithm with a probabilistic guarantee for robust deviation optimization

Three measures of robustness (absolute robustness, deviation robustness and relative robustness), whose choice depends on the goals of the decision maker, have been proposed for uncertain optimization problems. Absolute robustness has been thoroughly studied, whereas the others have been studied to less of a degree.We focus on deviation robustness for uncertain convex quadratic programming problems with ellipsoidal uncertainties and propose a relaxation technique based on random sampling for robust deviation optimization problems. We theoretically and experimentally show that solving the relaxation problem gives a tighter lower bound than solving a simple sampled relaxation problem. Furthermore, we measure the robustness of the solution in a probabilistic setting. The number of random samples is estimated for obtaining an approximate solution with a probabilistic guarantee, and the approximation error is evaluated a-priori and a-posteriori. Our relaxation algorithm with a probabilistic guarantee utilizes a-posteriori assessment to evaluate the accuracy of the approximate solutions.

[1]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  Tractable Approximations to Robust Conic Optimization Problems , 2006, Math. Program..

[2]  E. Yaz Linear Matrix Inequalities In System And Control Theory , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  A. Charnes,et al.  Chance-Constrained Programming , 1959 .

[4]  Pierre Bernhard Robust Optimization in Finance , 2011 .

[5]  Giuseppe Carlo Calafiore,et al.  Uncertain convex programs: randomized solutions and confidence levels , 2005, Math. Program..

[6]  Donald Goldfarb,et al.  Robust convex quadratically constrained programs , 2003, Math. Program..

[7]  Donald Goldfarb,et al.  Robust Portfolio Selection Problems , 2003, Math. Oper. Res..

[8]  H. Yaman,et al.  Restricted Robust Optimization for Maximization over Uniform Matroid with Interval Data Uncertainty , 2005 .

[9]  Vladimir A. Yakubovich,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory (S. Boyd, L. E. Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan) , 1995, SIAM Rev..

[10]  A. Nemirovski,et al.  Scenario Approximations of Chance Constraints , 2006 .

[11]  A Gerodimos,et al.  Robust Discrete Optimization and its Applications , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs , 1999, Oper. Res. Lett..

[13]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory , 1994 .

[14]  Laurent El Ghaoui,et al.  Robust Solutions to Least-Squares Problems with Uncertain Data , 1997, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[15]  Arkadi Nemirovski,et al.  Robust Convex Optimization , 1998, Math. Oper. Res..

[16]  G. Calafiore,et al.  Probabilistic and Randomized Methods for Design under Uncertainty , 2006 .

[17]  Takafumi Kanamori,et al.  Worst-Case Violation of Sampled Convex Programs for Optimization with Uncertainty , 2012, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[18]  Garud Iyengar,et al.  Ambiguous chance constrained problems and robust optimization , 2006, Math. Program..

[19]  Hande Yaman,et al.  The robust spanning tree problem with interval data , 2001, Oper. Res. Lett..

[20]  Yang Jian,et al.  On the robust shortest path problem , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[21]  Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al.  On the complexity of the robust spanning tree problem with interval data , 2004, Oper. Res. Lett..

[22]  Giuseppe Carlo Calafiore,et al.  The scenario approach to robust control design , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.