̀Spatial impulse response of a rectangular double curved transducer.

Calculation of the pressure field from transducers with both a convex and a concave surface geometry is a complicated assignment that often is accomplished by subdividing the transducer surface into smaller flat elements of which the spatial impulse response is known. This method is often applied to curved transducers because an analytical solution is unknown. In this work a semi-analytical algorithm for the exact solution to a first order in diffraction effect of the spatial impulse response of rectangular-shaped double curved transducers is presented. The solution and an approximation to it are investigated. The approximation reformulates the solution to an analytically integrable expression, which is computationally efficient to solve. Simulation results are compared to FIELD II simulations. Calculating the response from 200 different points yields a mean error for the different approximations ranging from 0.03% to 0.8% relative to a numerical solution for the spatial impulse response. It is also shown that the presented algorithm gives consistent results with FIELD II for a linear flat, a linear focused, and a convex nonfocused element. The solution involved a three-point Taylor expansion and gave an accuracy of 0.01%.

[1]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[2]  J. Meister,et al.  Acoustic fields of concave cylindrical transducers , 1990 .

[3]  P. Stepanishen The Time‐Dependent Force and Radiation Impedance on a Piston in a Rigid Infinite Planar Baffle , 1971 .

[4]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  T. Stepinski,et al.  Spatial impulse response method for predicting pulse-echo fields from a linear array with cylindrically concave surface , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  G. Tupholme Generation of acoustic pulses by baffled plane pistons , 1969 .

[7]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  A new calculation procedure for spatial impulse responses in ultrasound , 1999 .

[8]  Wide Bandwidth Acoustic Near and Far Field Transients from Baffled Pistons , 1977 .

[9]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Ultrasound fields from triangular apertures , 1996 .

[10]  P. R. Stepanishen An Approach to Computing Time‐Dependent Interaction Forces and Mutual Radiation Impedances between Pistons in a Rigid Planar Baffle , 1971 .

[11]  H. O'neil Theory of Focusing Radiators , 1949 .

[12]  Gerald R. Harris,et al.  Review of transient field theory for a baffled planar piston , 1981 .

[13]  S. Holm Ultrasim-a toolbox for ultrasound field simulation , 2012 .

[14]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Users' guide for the Field II program , 2011 .

[15]  J. Jensen,et al.  Testing of a spatial impulse response algorithm for double curved transducers , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[16]  F. Stuart Foster,et al.  Transient Fields of Concave Annular Arrays , 1981 .

[17]  J. N. Tjo,et al.  Nearfield and farfield of pulsed acoustic radiators , 1982 .

[18]  R. Kažys,et al.  Radiation of a rectangular strip-like focussing transducer: Part 2: Transient excitation , 1992 .

[19]  Calculation of Spatial Impulse Response for Array Transducer , 2005 .

[20]  Johan M. Thijssen,et al.  The impulse response of a focused source with an arbitrary axisymmetric surface velocity distribution , 1984 .

[21]  P. Stepanishen Transient Radiation from Pistons in an Infinite Planar Baffle , 1970 .

[22]  Radiation of a rectangular strip-like focussing transducer , 1992 .

[23]  J. C. Lockwood,et al.  High‐speed method for computing the exact solution for the pressure variations in the nearfield of a baffled piston , 1973 .

[24]  Mauri Luukkala,et al.  The impulse response and pressure nearfield of a curved ultrasonic radiator , 1976 .

[25]  K. Boone,et al.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[26]  W.F. Walker,et al.  A spline-based approach for computing spatial impulse responses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.