Complications and Adverse Events of Three Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Target Biopsy Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer Among Men with Prior Negative Biopsies: Results from the FUTURE Trial, a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial.

[1]  J. Barentsz,et al.  Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate? , 2020, European urology oncology.

[2]  J. Barentsz,et al.  The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies. , 2019, European urology.

[3]  Christina Hulsbergen-van de Kaa,et al.  Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. , 2019, European urology.

[4]  T. Mirtti,et al.  Patient Experience of Systematic Versus Fusion Prostate Biopsies. , 2018, European urology oncology.

[5]  M. Parmar,et al.  Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study. , 2018, Health technology assessment.

[6]  D. Margolis,et al.  MRI‐Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate‐Cancer Diagnosis , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  L. Hooft,et al.  Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique? , 2017, European urology.

[8]  J. Barentsz,et al.  The Future Trial: Fusion Target Biopsy of the Prostate Using Real-Time Ultrasound and MR Images. A Multicenter RCT on Target Biopsy Techniques in the Diagnosisof Prostate Cancer , 2015 .

[9]  D. Nieboer,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, European urology.

[10]  H. Katayama,et al.  Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria , 2015, Surgery Today.

[11]  Pierre Mozer,et al.  Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review. , 2015, European urology.

[12]  Yair Lotan,et al.  Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. , 2013, European urology.

[13]  C. di Ilio,et al.  Escherichia coli in Europe: An Overview , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[14]  Z. Tandoğdu,et al.  Infective complications after prostate biopsy: outcome of the Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2010 and 2011, a prospective multinational multicentre prostate biopsy study. , 2013, European urology.

[15]  B. Helfand,et al.  The Impact of Prostate Biopsy on Urinary Symptoms, Erectile Function, and Anxiety , 2012, Current Urology Reports.

[16]  H. Zeng,et al.  The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Asian journal of andrology.

[17]  M. Brock,et al.  The impact of prostate biopsy and periprostatic nerve block on erectile and voiding function: a prospective study. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[18]  A. Papatsoris,et al.  Can prostate biopsies affect erectile function? , 2006, Andrologia.

[19]  G. Heap,et al.  Complications of transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy , 2005, ANZ journal of surgery.

[20]  K. Ghani,et al.  Bleeding after transrectal ultrasonography‐guided prostate biopsy: a study of 7‐day morbidity after a six‐, eight‐ and 12‐core biopsy protocol , 2004, BJU international.

[21]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[22]  D. Margolis,et al.  PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. , 2016, European urology.

[23]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use. , 2016, European urology.

[24]  Mark Emberton,et al.  Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. , 2013, European urology.