Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer‐related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey

Background  Health information reaching the public today is often characterized by what decision theorists have termed ‘ambiguity’– i.e. uncertainty regarding the information’s reliability, credibility or adequacy. This is a critical problem, as growing research suggests that ambiguity has important effects–promoting pessimistic judgments about risks and potential outcomes of risk‐reducing behaviours, and lowering adoption of these behaviours. However, little is known about the public’s perceptions of ambiguity in the health information domain, the effects of these perceptions, and the factors that influence these effects.

[1]  W. Klein,et al.  Perceived Ambiguity about Screening Mammography Recommendations: Association with Future Mammography Uptake and Perceptions , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[2]  Michael Pignone,et al.  Prostate and colon cancer screening messages in popular magazines , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  Robert M. Kaplan,et al.  Evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test , 2001, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  Paul K J Han,et al.  Perceived Ambiguity About Cancer Prevention Recommendations: Relationship to Perceptions of Cancer Preventability, Risk, and Worry , 2006, Journal of health communication.

[5]  K. Viswanath,et al.  The communications revolution and cancer control , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[6]  Stacey L. Sheridan,et al.  Promoting Informed Choice: Transforming Health Care To Dispense Knowledge for Decision Making , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  K. Viswanath Science and society: the communications revolution and cancer control. , 2005, Nature reviews. Cancer.

[8]  Karen R. Sepucha,et al.  Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality. , 2004, Health affairs.

[9]  Ann Barry Flood,et al.  Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. , 2004, Health affairs.

[10]  B. Rimer,et al.  Informed decision making: What is its role in cancer screening? , 2004, Cancer.

[11]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): Development, Design, and Dissemination , 2004, Journal of health communication.

[12]  B. Schwartz The tyranny of choice. , 2004, Scientific American.

[13]  Floyd J Fowler,et al.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. , 2004, JAMA.

[14]  Laurence B McCullough,et al.  A Typology of Shared Decision Making, Informed Consent, and Simple Consent , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Nisha Gandhi,et al.  Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  Marie Helweg-Larsen,et al.  Are Comparative Risk Judgments Consistent Across Time and Events? , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  S. Whitney A New Model of Medical Decisions: Exploring the Limits of Shared Decision Making , 2003, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  Robert J Volk,et al.  Patient Education for Informed Decision Making About Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-Up , 2003, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[19]  B. Rimer,et al.  Another round in the mammography controversy. , 2003, Journal of women's health.

[20]  Howard Leventhal,et al.  The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. , 2003 .

[21]  L. Cameron Conceptualizing and Assessing Risk Perceptions : A Self-Regulatory Perspective , 2003 .

[22]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  P. Ubel Is Information Always a Good Thing?: Helping Patients Make “Good” Decisions , 2002, Medical care.

[24]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  News media coverage of screening mammography for women in their 40s and tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer. , 2002, JAMA.

[25]  C. P. Cooper,et al.  Science writers' reactions to a medical "breakthrough" story. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[26]  C. Schneider,et al.  How underlying patient beliefs can affect physician-patient communication about prostate-specific antigen testing. , 2002, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[27]  R. Moynihan,et al.  On music , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  G. Yamey,et al.  The PSA storm , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Michael J Barry,et al.  Health Decision Aids To Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Office Practice , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  E. D. de Leeuw,et al.  Trends in household survey nonresponse: a longitudinal and international comparison , 2002 .

[31]  K. Warriner,et al.  Evaluating Socio-economic Status (SES) Bias in Survey Nonresponse , 2002 .

[32]  A. Sowden,et al.  Increasing informed uptake and non‐uptake of screening: evidence from a systematic review , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[33]  T Hyslop,et al.  Intention to be tested for prostate cancer risk among African-American men. , 2000, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[34]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[35]  M. Essink‐bot,et al.  Why do men refuse or attend population-based screening for prostate cancer? , 2000, Journal of public health medicine.

[36]  E. Rutgers,et al.  Interpretive Review : Feasibility and Effects of Decision Aids , 2000, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[37]  J G Thornton,et al.  Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. , 1999, Health technology assessment.

[38]  W. Viscusi,et al.  Smoking Status and Public Responses to Ambiguous Scientific Risk Evidence , 1999 .

[39]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review , 1999, BMJ.

[40]  M. Diefenbach,et al.  Specific worry about breast cancer predicts mammography use in women at risk for breast and ovarian cancer. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[41]  R. Myers,et al.  African American men, prostate cancer early detection examination use, and informed decision-making. , 1999, Seminars in oncology.

[42]  I. Lipkus,et al.  Relationships among breast cancer concern, risk perceptions, and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility among African-American women with and without a family history of breast cancer. , 1999, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[43]  B. Rimer,et al.  Confusion about mammography: prevalence and consequences. , 1999, Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine.

[44]  J. Schorling,et al.  Predictors of interest in prostate-specific antigen screening and the impact of informed consent: what should we tell our patients? , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[45]  C. Charles,et al.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[46]  R. Myers,et al.  Factors associated with intention to undergo annual prostate cancer screening among African American men in Philadelphia , 1996, Cancer.

[47]  J. Schorling,et al.  The impact of informed consent on patient interest in prostate-specific antigen screening. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[48]  H Kunreuther,et al.  Cognitive processes and the decisions of some parents to forego pertussis vaccination for their children. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[49]  B. Rimer,et al.  Knowledge, beliefs, and prior screening behavior among blacks and whites reporting for prostate cancer screening. , 1995, Urology.

[50]  D. Redelmeier,et al.  Medical decision making in situations that offer multiple alternatives. , 1995, JAMA.

[51]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity , 1992 .

[52]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship. , 1992, JAMA.

[53]  Joel Huber,et al.  Communication of ambiguous risk information , 1991 .

[54]  M. Stefanek,et al.  First degree relatives of breast cancer patients: screening practices and provision of risk information. , 1991, Cancer detection and prevention.

[55]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity , 1990 .

[56]  Shawn P. Curley,et al.  An empirical evaluation of descriptive models of ambiguity reactions in choice situations , 1989 .

[57]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Decision Making under Ambiguity , 1986 .

[58]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference. , 1985 .

[60]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .