Multi-Winner Election Control via Social Influence: Hardness and Algorithms for Restricted Cases

Nowadays, many political campaigns are using social influence in order to convince voters to support/oppose a specific candidate/party. In election control via social influence problem, an attacker tries to find a set of limited influencers to start disseminating a political message in a social network of voters. A voter will change his opinion when he receives and accepts the message. In constructive case, the goal is to maximize the number of votes/winners of a target candidate/party, while in destructive case, the attacker tries to minimize them. Recent works considered the problem in different models and presented some hardness and approximation results. In this work, we consider multi-winner election control through social influence on different graph structures and diffusion models, and our goal is to maximize/minimize the number of winners in our target party. We show that the problem is hard to approximate when voters’ connections form a graph, and the diffusion model is the linear threshold model. We also prove the same result considering an arborescence under independent cascade model. Moreover, we present a dynamic programming algorithm for the cases that the voting system is a variation of straight-party voting, and voters form a tree.

[1]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[2]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election , 2017, First Monday.

[3]  Gianlorenzo D'Angelo,et al.  Multi-Winner Election Control via Social Influence , 2020, SIROCCO.

[4]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Maximizing the Spread of Influence through a Social Network , 2015, Theory Comput..

[5]  Dilip Kumar Pratihar,et al.  A survey on influence maximization in a social network , 2018, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[6]  M. Gentzkow,et al.  Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election , 2017 .

[7]  Arnim Bleier,et al.  Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter , 2018, Studying Politics Across Media.

[8]  Weili Wu,et al.  On Bharathi–Kempe–Salek conjecture for influence maximization on arborescence , 2016, J. Comb. Optim..

[9]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Straight-Party Voting: What Do Voters Think? , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[10]  Daniel Kreiss,et al.  Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle , 2016, New Media Soc..

[11]  Weili Wu,et al.  Solution of Bharathi–Kempe–Salek conjecture for influence maximization on arborescence , 2017, J. Comb. Optim..

[12]  H. Kritzer Roll-Off in State Court Elections: The Impact of the Straight-Ticket Voting Option , 2016, Journal of Law and Courts.

[13]  Yuchen Li,et al.  Influence Maximization on Social Graphs: A Survey , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.