A cooperative multi-agent approach to free flight

The next generation of air traffic control will require automated decision support systems in order to meet safety, reliability, flexibility, and robustness demands in an environment of steadily increasing air traffic density. Automation is most readily implemented in free flight, the segment of flight between airports. In this environment, centralized control is impractical, and on-board distributed decision making is required. To be effective, such decision making must be cooperative. Satisficing game theory provides a theoretical framework in which autonomous decision makers may coordinate their decisions. The key feature of the theory is that, unlike conventional game theory which is purely egotistic in its structure, it provides a natural mechanism for decision makers to form their preferences by taking into consideration the preferences of others. In this way, a controlled form of conditional altruism is possible, such that agents are able to compromise so that every decision maker receives due consideration in a group environment. Simulations demonstrate that reliable performance can be achieved with densities on the order of 50 planes per ten thousand square miles.

[1]  X. Jin Factor graphs and the Sum-Product Algorithm , 2002 .

[2]  L. Geppert,et al.  Lost Radio Contact Leaves Pilots on Their Own , 2004, IEEE Spectrum.

[3]  Alex M. Andrew Satisficing Games and Decision Making: With Applications to Engineering and Computer Science , 2005 .

[4]  Eric Feron,et al.  Stability of intersecting aircraft flows using heading change maneuvers for conflict avoidance , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[5]  Stefan Resmerita,et al.  A framework for conflict resolution in air traffic management , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[6]  L. Geppert A static RAM says goodbye to data errors [radiation induced soft errors] , 2004, IEEE Spectrum.

[7]  Joseph S. B. Mitchell,et al.  SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF CENTRALIZED AND DECENTRALIZED AIR TRAFFIC SEPARATION STRATEGIES , 2001 .

[8]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Safety of a decentralized scheme for free-flight ATMS using mixed integer linear programming , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[9]  T. Perry In search of the future of air traffic control , 1997 .

[10]  Stefan Resmerita,et al.  Conflict resolution in multi-agent systems , 2003, 42nd IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37475).

[11]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Conflict resolution problems for air traffic management systems solved with mixed integer programming , 2002, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[12]  John Hayhurst THE FUTURE OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL , 2001 .

[13]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Stability and performance of intersecting aircraft flows under decentralized conflict avoidance rules , 2001, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[14]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems , 1988 .

[15]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.