RO-ILS: Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System: A report from the first year of experience.

PURPOSE Incident learning is a critical tool to improve patient safety. The Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 established essential legal protections to allow for the collection and analysis of medical incidents nationwide. METHODS AND MATERIALS Working with a federally listed patient safety organization (PSO), the American Society for Radiation Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine established RO-ILS: Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System (RO-ILS). This paper provides an overview of the RO-ILS background, development, structure, and workflow, as well as examples of preliminary data and lessons learned. RO-ILS is actively collecting, analyzing, and reporting patient safety events. RESULTS As of February 24, 2015, 46 institutions have signed contracts with Clarity PSO, with 33 contracts pending. Of these, 27 sites have entered 739 patient safety events into local database space, with 358 events (48%) pushed to the national database. CONCLUSIONS To establish an optimal safety culture, radiation oncology departments should establish formal systems for incident learning that include participation in a nationwide incident learning program such as RO-ILS.

[1]  Peter Dunscombe,et al.  Patient safety improvements in radiation treatment through 5 years of incident learning. , 2013, Practical radiation oncology.

[2]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Can evidence-based medicine and clinical quality improvement learn from each other? , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[3]  E. Ford,et al.  Measurable improvement in patient safety culture: A departmental experience with incident learning. , 2015, Practical radiation oncology.

[4]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[5]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Improving patient safety in radiation oncology. , 2010, Medical physics.

[6]  Peter Mauch,et al.  Technological advancements and error rates in radiation therapy delivery. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Kabir Khanna,et al.  Exploring Relationships Between Hospital Patient Safety Culture and Adverse Events , 2010, Journal of patient safety.

[8]  A. Wall,et al.  Book ReviewTo Err is Human: building a safer health system Kohn L T Corrigan J M Donaldson M S Washington DC USA: Institute of Medicine/National Academy Press ISBN 0 309 06837 1 $34.95 , 2000 .

[9]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Balancing "no blame" with accountability in patient safety. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette,et al.  Trend analysis of radiation therapy incidents over seven years. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  T Pawlicki,et al.  Consensus recommendations for incident learning database structures in radiation oncology. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  L. Leape Error in Medicine , 1994 .

[13]  M. Barton,et al.  The use of categorized time-trend reporting of radiation oncology incidents: a proactive analytical approach to improving quality and safety over time. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Sidney Dekker,et al.  The Field Guide to Understanding 'Human Error' , 2014 .

[15]  Frances Fiorino CAST-ing a safety net , 2005 .

[16]  M. Williams,et al.  Improving patient safety in radiotherapy by learning from near misses, incidents and errors. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  T. Showalter,et al.  Radiation oncology services in the modern era: evolving patterns of usage and payments in the office setting for medicare patients from 2000 to 2010. , 2014, Journal of oncology practice.