Can the Response of the Iris to Light be Used to Break the Code of the Second Cranial Nerve in Man

The sphincture muscle of the vertebrate iris develops tension causing the aperture stop of the eye to become small in the light, and loses tension making it expand in the dark. In this way, the light available to the sensory retina can alternatively be diminished when the world is too bright and increased when it is too dim. This elegant servomechanism is a textbook example, so we are told, of a homeostatic mechanism maintaining the exquisite sensitivity of the vertebrate retina constant while environmental light fluctuates. Nonsense! The maintenance of good retinal sensitivity over a range of 10,000,000,000,000 fold from the one extreme near the theoretical limit of detection to the other extreme at which the light becomes so intense that the retina starts to burn, is no doubt a prize achievement of Mother Nature as a bioengineer, but the photopupillary response has precious little to do with it. The small fluctuations of pupil area available (about 1.2 log10 units, for example, for the human eye) is trivial in this context.

[1]  H B Barlow,et al.  Dark-adaptation: a new hypothesis. , 1964, Vision research.

[2]  M. Alpern,et al.  Directional sensitivity of the pupillomotor photoreceptors. , 1953, American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  F. Campbell,et al.  Effect of Size of Pupil on Visual Acuity , 1960, Nature.

[4]  M. Alpern,et al.  Photosensitivity of the Frog Iris , 1963, The Journal of general physiology.

[5]  M Alpern,et al.  Effect of photoexcitation of the two retinas on pupil size. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Alpern,et al.  The effect of bleaching and backgrounds on pupil size. , 1972, Vision research.

[7]  F. A. Geldard The Human Senses , 1972 .

[8]  W. A. Hagins The visual process: Excitatory mechanisms in the primary receptor cells. , 1972, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[9]  M. G. Holland,et al.  Rhodopsin bleaching signals in essential night blindness , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  W. Stiles,et al.  Saturation of the Rod Mechanism of the Retina at High Levels of Stimulation , 1954 .

[11]  K H Spring,et al.  VARIATION OF PUPIL SIZE WITH CHANGE IN THE ANGLE AT WHICH THE LIGHT STIMULUS STRIKES THE RETINA* , 1948, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  J. Dowling,et al.  Intracellular Recordings from Single Rods and Cones in the Mudpuppy Retina , 1973, Science.

[13]  E. Denton THE RESPONSES OF THE PUPIL OF GEKKO GEKKO TO EXTERNAL LIGHT STIMULUS , 1956, The Journal of general physiology.

[14]  M. Alpern,et al.  The enigma of typical total monochromacy. , 1960, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  D. G. Green,et al.  Closed-circuit television pupillometer. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  F. Campbell,et al.  The spectral sensitivity of the consensual light reflex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  T. Kuwabara,et al.  Retinal damage by visible light. An electron microscopic study. , 1968, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  M. Alpern,et al.  The attenuation of rod signals by backgrounds , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  W. Noell,et al.  Irreversible Effects of Visible Light on the Retina: Role of Vitamin A , 1971, Science.

[20]  M. Alpern,et al.  Typical total monochromacy. A histological and psychophysical study. , 1965, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  F. A. Geldard The Description of a Case of Total Color Blindness , 1933 .

[22]  H Herman Bouma,et al.  Receptive systems : mediating certain light reactions of the pupil of the human eye , 1965 .

[23]  W A Rushton,et al.  The rod dark adaptation curve measured above cone threshold. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  William Albert Hugh Rushton,et al.  The Ferrier Lecture, 1962 Visual adaptation , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.