Upper limb recovery after stroke: The stroke survivors' perspective

Purpose. This study investigated stroke survivors' perspective of upper limb recovery after stroke. The aim was to determine factors other than medical diagnosis and co-morbidities that contribute to recovery. The objectives were to explore how stroke survivors define recovery, identify factors they believe influence recovery and determine strategies used to maximize upper limb recovery. Method. A qualitative study consisting of three focus groups and two in-depth interviews was conducted with stroke survivors (n = 19) and spouses (n = 9) in metropolitan, regional and rural Queensland, Australia. Data were analysed using principles of grounded theory. Results. Stroke survivors maximize upper limb recovery by ‘keeping the door open’ a process of continuing to hope for and work towards improvement amidst adjusting to life with stroke. They achieve this by ‘hanging in there’, ‘drawing on support from others’, ‘getting going and keeping going with exercise’, and ‘finding out how to keep moving ahead’. Conclusions. This study provides valuable insight into the personal experience of upper limb recovery after stroke. It highlights the need to develop training strategies that match the needs and aspirations of stroke survivors and that place no time limits on recovery. It reinforces the benefits of stroke support groups and advocates their incorporation into stroke recovery services. These findings can be used to guide both the development and evaluation of stroke survivor centred upper limb training programmes.

[1]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  J. Morse Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[3]  H. Feys,et al.  Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[4]  M. Bendz Rules of relevance after a stroke. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[5]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  N. Doolittle,et al.  The Experience of Recovery Following Lacunar Stroke , 1992, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[7]  T. Hafsteinsdóttir,et al.  Being a stroke patient: a review of the literature. , 1997, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[10]  Robert C. Wagenaar,et al.  Therapy Impact on Functional Recovery in Stroke Rehabilitation , 1999 .

[11]  D. McLean,et al.  Medical complications experienced by a cohort of stroke survivors during inpatient, tertiary-level stroke rehabilitation. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  M. Reding,et al.  Effect of Lesion Location on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[13]  C. Burton,et al.  Re-thinking stroke rehabilitation: the Corbin and Strauss chronic illness trajectory framework. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  Joyce Shapero Sabari,et al.  Reflections upon rehabilitation by members of a community based stroke club , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. , 1997, Stroke.

[16]  A. Forster,et al.  Recovering from stroke: a qualitative investigation of the role of goal setting in late stroke recovery. , 1999, Journal of advanced nursing.

[17]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[18]  G. White,et al.  Consumer participation in disability research: The golden rule as a guide for ethical practice. , 2002 .

[19]  C. Burton,et al.  Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[20]  B. Hanna,et al.  Recovery after stroke: a qualitative perspective. , 2001, Journal of quality in clinical practice.

[21]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  T Dowswell,et al.  Investigating recovery from stroke: a qualitative study. , 2000, Journal of clinical nursing.

[23]  Kate Lorig,et al.  Patients as partners in managing chronic disease , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .