California's graduated driver license law: Effect on teenage drivers' deaths through 2005.

PROBLEM While many researchers believe Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) laws save lives by imposing restrictions and delayed licensure on drivers under age 18, longer term effects on older teenagers have not been studied. METHOD The effects of California's strict GDL law on deaths of drivers ages 16-19 were analyzed for 1995-2005 using Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) and Auto-Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) time series analysis of Fatality Analysis Reporting System mortality data. RESULTS The two methods yielded similar results. IRR analysis found California 16-year-old drivers subject to the GDL experienced a 15% fatality decline (95% CI, 0.70-0.99), while 18 year-old drivers experienced a 15% increase (95% CI, 1.02-1.27). ARIMA analysis found 16 year-old drivers experienced a near-significant 20% fatality decline (p=0.07), while 18 year-olds experienced a 24% increase (p=0.01). Unlicensed teenage drivers and older teen drivers driving alone and transporting teenage passengers suffered significant fatality increases. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION California's GDL may negatively affect older teenagers and other driver subpopulations and merits reevaluation.

[1]  Corinne Peek-Asa,et al.  Effects of the California graduated driver licensing program. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[2]  M. Mikulincer,et al.  From parents to children—similarity in parents and offspring driving styles , 2005 .

[3]  L U Ray,et al.  Motor vehicle occupant crashes among teens: impact of the graduated licensing law in San Diego. , 2001, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[4]  David C Grabowski,et al.  The strength of graduated drivers license programs and fatalities among teen drivers and passengers. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  E A Rodgman,et al.  Initial effects of graduated driver licensing on 16-year-old driver crashes in North Carolina. , 2001, JAMA.

[6]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Responses of teenagers and their parents to California's graduated licensing system. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Susan P. Baker,et al.  Graduated Driver Licensing Programs and Fatal Crashes of 16-Year-Old Drivers: A National Evaluation , 2006, Pediatrics.

[8]  Heikki Summala,et al.  The "genetics" of driving behavior: parents' driving style predicts their children's driving style. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  David C Grabowski,et al.  Graduated driver licensing and teen traffic fatalities. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[10]  David Gillen,et al.  Impacts of California's Graduated Licensing Law of 1998: An assessment by the Institute of Transportation Studies at UC Berkeley of the effects of the law on fatal and injury crashes of 16 year-old drivers , 2004 .

[11]  Herb M Simpson,et al.  The evolution and effectiveness of graduated licensing. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[12]  P. Asch,et al.  Does the minimum drinking age affect traffic fatalities , 1987 .

[13]  J T Shope,et al.  Graduated driver licensing in Michigan: early impact on motor vehicle crashes among 16-year-old drivers. , 2001, JAMA.

[14]  Mike A. Males.  California's Graduated Driver License Law: Effects on Older Teenagers , 2006 .

[15]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[16]  James H. Hedlund,et al.  What we know, what we don't know, and what we need to know about graduated driver licensing. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[17]  William N. Evans,et al.  Behavior Policies and Teen Traffic Safety , 2001 .

[18]  Scott V Masten,et al.  Evaluation of California's graduated driver licensing program. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[19]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Intervention Analysis with Applications to Economic and Environmental Problems , 1975 .