Day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is used to manage symptomatic gallstones. There is considerable controversy regarding whether it should be done as day-surgery or as an overnight stay surgery with regards to patient safety. OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of day-surgery versus overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient-oriented outcomes such as mortality, severe adverse events, and quality of life. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and mRCT until September 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised clinical trials comparing day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, irrespective of language or publication status. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and independently extracted the data. We analysed the data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using Review Manager 5 analysis. We calculated the risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on intention-to-treat or available case analysis. MAIN RESULTS We identified a total of six trials at high risk of bias involving 492 participants undergoing day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 239) versus overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 253) for symptomatic gallstones. The number of participants in each trial ranged from 28 to 150. The proportion of women in the trials varied between 74% and 84%. The mean or median age in the trials varied between 40 and 47 years.With regards to primary outcomes, only one trial reported short-term mortality. However, the trial stated that there were no deaths in either of the groups. We inferred from the other outcomes that there was no short-term mortality in the remaining trials. Long-term mortality was not reported in any of the trials. There was no significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events between the two groups (4 trials; 391 participants; 7/191 (weighted rate 1.6%) in the day-surgery group versus 1/200 (0.5%) in the overnight stay surgery group; rate ratio 3.24; 95% CI 0.74 to 14.09). There was no significant difference in quality of life between the two groups (4 trials; 333 participants; SMD -0.11; 95% CI -0.33 to 0.10).There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the secondary outcomes of our review: pain (3 trials; 175 participants; MD 0.02 cm visual analogue scale score; 95% CI -0.69 to 0.73); time to return to activity (2 trials, 217 participants; MD -0.55 days; 95% CI -2.18 to 1.08); and return to work (1 trial, 74 participants; MD -2.00 days; 95% CI -10.34 to 6.34). No significant difference was seen in hospital readmission rate (5 trials; 464 participants; 6/225 (weighted rate 0.5%) in the day-surgery group versus 5/239 (2.1%) in the overnight stay surgery group (rate ratio 1.25; 95% CI 0.43 to 3.63) or in the proportion of people requiring hospital readmissions (3 trials; 290 participants; 5/136 (weighted proportion 3.5%) in the day-surgery group versus 5/154 (3.2%) in the overnight stay surgery group; RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.33 to 3.60). No significant difference was seen in the proportion of failed discharge (failure to be discharged as planned) between the two groups (5 trials; 419 participants; 42/205 (weighted proportion 19.3%) in the day-surgery group versus 43/214 (20.1%) in the overnight stay surgery group; RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.41). For all outcomes except pain, the accrued information was far less than the diversity-adjusted required information size to exclude random errors. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Day-surgery appears just as safe as overnight stay surgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Day-surgery does not seem to result in improvement in any patient-oriented outcomes such as return to normal activity or earlier return to work. The randomised clinical trials backing these statements are weakened by risks of systematic errors (bias) and risks of random errors (play of chance). More randomised clinical trials are needed to assess the impact of day-surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the quality of life as well as other outcomes of patients.

[1]  M. Parvaiz,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2006 .

[2]  Day care or hospital admission after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized trial , 1998 .

[3]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Ethan M Balk,et al.  Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  Anika Ashok,et al.  ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline , 2009 .

[6]  Ireland,et al.  Day case and short stay surgery: 2 , 2011, Anaesthesia.

[7]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[8]  A. Shamiyeh,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment , 2004, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[9]  J. Ahlberg,et al.  Prevalence of gallstone disease in a Swedish population. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[10]  D. Gouma,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observation. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[11]  Robert West,et al.  About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)). , 2011 .

[12]  R. Padbury,et al.  A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 1999, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[13]  K. Thorlund,et al.  Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  G. Nordström,et al.  Outpatient versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study of symptom occurrence, symptom distress and general state of health during the first post-operative week. , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[15]  K. Gurusamy,et al.  Day-case versus overnight stay in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  K. Todd,et al.  The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores. , 1996, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[17]  K. Gurusamy,et al.  Meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day‐case laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  T. Jørgensen.  Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  Pamela Royle,et al.  LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES , 2003, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[20]  Christian Gluud,et al.  Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  L. Lundell,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of day‐care versus overnight‐stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[23]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[24]  M. Rosen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy , 2001, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[25]  Ich Harmonised,et al.  INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONISATION OF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR REGISTRATION OF PHARMACEUTICALS FOR HUMAN USE , 2006 .

[26]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses? , 2009, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  L. Krähenbühl,et al.  Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2011, The British journal of surgery.

[28]  Ross J. Harris,et al.  Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. , 2012, Health technology assessment.

[29]  M. Parvaiz,et al.  Letter: randomized clinical trial of day‐care versus overnight‐stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2006; 93: 40–45) , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[30]  J. Abraham.  The international conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use , 2009 .

[31]  K. Thorlund,et al.  Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[32]  D. Cook,et al.  Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? , 1998, The Lancet.

[33]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[34]  S D Walter,et al.  A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  Clinical Epidemiology Dovepress , 2022 .

[36]  D L Demets,et al.  Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. , 1987, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  David Moher,et al.  SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. , 2015, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[38]  Kristian Thorlund,et al.  Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. , 2009, International journal of epidemiology.

[39]  R. Burney,et al.  Ambulatory and admitted laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients have comparable outcomes but different functional health status , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[40]  D J Newell,et al.  Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. , 1992, International journal of epidemiology.

[41]  H. V. Liddle,et al.  Commonbile-duct stones. , 1958, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  M. Curet,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Outpatient vs inpatient management , 2002 .

[43]  Dirksen Cd,et al.  [Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study]. , 2001 .

[44]  E. Kullman,et al.  Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[45]  P. Sedman,et al.  Prospective comparison of ambulatory with inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome, patient preference and satisfaction , 2004 .

[46]  P. Selas,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and outpatient surgery. , 2004 .

[47]  J. de Haes,et al.  Day care or hospital admission after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized trial , 1998 .

[48]  K. Gurusamy,et al.  Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery , 2009, The British journal of surgery.

[49]  J. Keulemans,et al.  Laparoscopische cholecystectomie in dagbehandeling even effectief als tijdens opname en goedkoper: een gerandomiseerd onderzoek , 1999 .