The design of spacecraft trajectories is a crucial part of a space mission design. Often the mission goal is tightly related to the spacecraft trajectory. A geostationary orbit is indeed mandatory for a stationary equatorial position. Visiting a solar system planet implies that a proper trajectory is used to bring the spacecraft from Earth to the vicinity of the planet. The first planetary missions were based on conventional trajectories obtained with chemical engine rockets. The manoeuvres could be considered 'impulsive' and clear limitations to the possible missions were set by the energy required to reach certain orbits. The gravity-assist trajectories opened a new way of wandering through the solar system, by exploiting the gravitational field of some planets. The advent of other propulsion techniques, as electric or ion propulsion and solar sail, opened a new dimension to the planetary trajectory, while at the same time posing new challenges. These 'low thrust' propulsion techniques cannot be considered 'impulsive' anymore and require for their study mathematical techniques which are substantially different from before. The optimisation of such trajectories is also a new field of flight dynamics, which involves complex treatments especially in multi-revolution cases as in a lunar transfer trajectory. One advantage of these trajectories is that they allow to explore regions of space where different bodies gravitationally compete with each other. We can exploit therefore these gravitational perturbations to save fuel or reduce time of flight. The SMART-1 spacecraft, first European mission to the Moon, will test for the first time all these techniques. The paper is a summary report on various activities conducted by the project team in these areas.
[1]
A. Giorgilli,et al.
Kolmogorov theorem and classical perturbation theory
,
1997
.
[2]
Sophie Geffroy,et al.
Généralisation des techniques de moyennation en contrôle optimal : application aux problèmes de transfert et rendez-vous orbitaux à poussée faible
,
1997
.
[3]
H. Malchow,et al.
Optimal low thrust geocentric transfer
,
1973
.
[4]
Richard Epenoy,et al.
Optimal low-thrust transfers with constraints---generalization of averaging techniques
,
1997
.
[5]
Bernard H. Foing,et al.
Smart-1: The First Time Of Europe To The Moon; Wandering in the Earth–Moon Space
,
1999
.
[6]
E. Belbruno,et al.
Lunar capture orbits, a method of constructing earth moon trajectories and the lunar GAS mission. [Get Away Specials]
,
1987
.
[7]
J. Mather,et al.
Existence of quasi-periodic orbits for twist homeomorphisms of the annulus
,
1982
.
[8]
Guy Pignolet,et al.
Using a Solar Sail for a Plasma Storm Early Warning System
,
1996
.
[9]
Otto Wagner,et al.
Mercury Sun-Synchronous Polar Orbits Using Solar Sail Propulsion
,
1996
.
[10]
Massimiliano Vasile,et al.
Optimal Interplanetary Trajectories Using a Combination of Low-Thrust and Gravity Assist Manoeuvres
,
2000
.
[11]
Bernard H. Foing,et al.
SMART-1: The First Time of Europe to the Moon
,
2001
.
[12]
Giuseppe D. Racca.
Capability of solar electric propulsion for planetary missions
,
2001
.
[13]
J. W. Cornelisse.
Trajectory analysis for interplanetary missions.
,
1978
.