Temporal trends in the use of early cardiac catheterization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (results from CRUSADE).

[1]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Utilization of Early Invasive Management Strategies for High-Risk Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Results From the CRUSADE Quality Improvement Initiative , 2004 .

[2]  E. Braunwald,et al.  The Effect of Routine, Early Invasive Management on Outcome for Elderly Patients with NonST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  J. Gore,et al.  Implications of diabetes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Age, risk-benefit trade-offs, and the projected effects of evidence-based therapies , 2004 .

[5]  S. Borzak,et al.  Analysis of long-term survival after revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease presenting with acute coronary syndromes. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Effects of renal insufficiency on early invasive management in patients with acute coronary syndromes (The TACTICS-TIMI 18 Trial). , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  Robert H Christenson,et al.  Improving the care of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department: the CRUSADE initiative. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[8]  J. W. Schaeffer,et al.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—summary article , 2002 .

[9]  Carl J Pepine,et al.  ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction--2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients , 2002, Circulation.

[10]  K. Fox,et al.  Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[11]  L. Wallentin,et al.  The prognostic and therapeutic implications of increased troponin T levels and ST depression in unstable coronary artery disease: the FRISC II invasive troponin T electrocardiogram substudy. , 2002, American heart journal.

[12]  L. Wallentin,et al.  ST depression in ECG at entry indicates severe coronary lesions and large benefits of an early invasive treatment strategy in unstable coronary artery disease , 2002 .

[13]  L. Wallentin,et al.  ST depression in ECG at entry indicates severe coronary lesions and large benefits of an early invasive treatment strategy in unstable coronary artery disease. The FRISC II ECG substudy , 2002 .

[14]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a randomized trial. , 2001, JAMA.

[15]  J. Avorn,et al.  Use of risk stratification to identify patients with unstable angina likeliest to benefit from an invasive versus conservative management strategy. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  F. Ragmin.  Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study , 1999, The Lancet.

[18]  P J Scanlon,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and , 1999, Circulation.

[19]  J. Murray,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.