Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good

Several contingent valuation studies have found that the open-ended format yields lower estimates of willingness to pay (WTP) than does the closed-ended, or dichotomous choice, format. In this study, WTP for a public environmental good was estimated under four conditions: actual payment in response to open-ended and closed-ended requests, and hypothetical payment in response to open-ended and closed-ended requests. The experimental results, showing that the response format mattered far more for hypothetical than for actual payments, support conclusions about the reasons that the dichotomous choice format yields larger estimates of hypothetical WTP, conclusions that hinge on the hypothetical nature of contingent valuation.

[1]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability , 1993 .

[2]  B. Kriström.  Comparing continuous and discrete contingent valuation questions , 1993 .

[3]  M. K. amer R. Haefele,et al.  Estimating the total value of forest quality in high-elevation spruce-fire forests , 1992 .

[4]  R. Gregory,et al.  How precise are monetary representations of environmental improvements , 1995 .

[5]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1987 .

[6]  Jon Strand,et al.  Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway: A contingent valuation study with real payment , 1990 .

[7]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? , 1979 .

[8]  Alan Randall,et al.  A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation , 1987 .

[9]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[10]  Glenn C. Blomquist,et al.  Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are Ambivalent , 1995 .

[11]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Testing Willingness-to-Pay Models of Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Survey Data , 1995 .

[12]  Barbara Kanninen,et al.  Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation , 1995 .

[13]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Sensitivity of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates to Bid Design in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Models , 1992 .

[14]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  DICHOTOMOUS-CHOICE, CONTINGENT-VALUATION QUESTIONS: FUNCTIONAL FORM IS IMPORTANT , 1990 .

[15]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  Welfare Measurements Using Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of Techniques , 1988 .

[16]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments , 1994 .

[17]  Bengt Kriström,et al.  A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. , 1990 .

[18]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Comment , 1989 .

[19]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[20]  Randall A. Kramer,et al.  An Independent Sample Test of Yea-Saying and Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous-Choice Contingent Valuation , 1995 .

[21]  Kevin J. Boyle,et al.  Valuing public goods: discrete versus continuous contingent-valuation responses. , 1996 .

[22]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection , 1993 .

[23]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[24]  T. Amemiya.  QUALITATIVE RESPONSE MODELS: A SURVEY , 1981 .

[25]  John R. Stoll,et al.  Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource , 1988 .

[26]  Jean-Paul Chavas,et al.  Validation of Empirical Measures of Welfare Change: A Comparison of Nonmarket Techniques , 1985 .

[27]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression' , 1988 .

[28]  G. S. Maddala,et al.  Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics: Two-stage estimation methods , 1983 .

[29]  R. Turner,et al.  A Test of the Equality of Closed-Ended and Open-Ended Contingent Valuations , 1993 .

[30]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[31]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[32]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates , 1994 .

[33]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .