TweetGames: A framework for twitter-based collaborative social online games

Today social networks and microblogging services attract much attention and their importance and pervasion is constantly increasing. This trend is fostered by the increasing prevalence of mobile internet devices, which enable users to be online every time and everywhere. A popular kind of applications provided via social network platforms are games. While existing social network games basically realize common online game principles where each user controls a single game entity and acts on its own behalf, this paper presents a framework for the creation of a novel kind of social online games. The idea is to enable games where users do not act as individual game entities, instead groups of users control one game entity whose behavior emerges from the collective behavior of all group members. The framework is based on the microblogging service Twitter and users interact with the game via Twitter messages. These collaborative social online games are not just an innovative social network application, the intention of our framework is rather to provide a useful and powerful tool to complex social network researchers to study emergent and collective user behavior on a large scale utilizing the huge user base of a social network service like Twitter. In addition to presenting the idea of collaborative social online games along with the so-called TweetGame framework, this paper presents a sample application that has already been realized on top of this framework as proof of concept.

[1]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Collective Behavior , 2002 .

[2]  Vince Darley Emergent Phenomena and Complexity , 2004 .

[3]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Physics of the rhythmic applause. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[4]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[5]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[6]  F. Galton Vox Populi , 1907, Nature.

[7]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[8]  Z. Popovic,et al.  Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[9]  F. Schweitzer,et al.  SOCIAL IMPACT MODELS OF OPINION DYNAMICS , 2001 .

[10]  E.M. Atkins,et al.  A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[11]  S. Asch Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[12]  Ilan Yaniv,et al.  Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgments , 2007 .

[13]  M. Macy,et al.  FROM FACTORS TO ACTORS: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling , 2002 .

[14]  Igor Kanovsky,et al.  Model of Opinion Spreading in Social Networks , 2011, ArXiv.

[15]  Ulrik Brandes,et al.  Social Networks , 2013, Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization.

[16]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[17]  A. Czirók,et al.  Collective Motion , 1999, physics/9902023.

[18]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[19]  D. Helbing,et al.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[21]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[22]  Albert E. Mannes Are We Wise About the Wisdom of Crowds? The Use of Group Judgments in Belief Revision , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Naïve Learning in Social Networks and the Wisdom of Crowds , 2010 .

[24]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  How You Named Your Child: Understanding the Relationship Between Individual Decision Making and Collective Outcomes , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[25]  김정기,et al.  Propagation , 1994, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.