Magnetic navigation in a coronary phantom: experimental results.

OBJECTIVE The objective was to investigate the efficacy of a magnetic navigation system (MNS) in a coronary phantom. BACKGROUND The number of coronary interventional procedures performed is steadily increasing with the availability of new devices to treat more complex lesions. Vessel tortuosity remains an important limiting factor in percutaneous coronary intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS The MNS can orient the tip of magnetized wire. The coronary phantom is a representation of the coronary tree. Two operators using both a magnetic wire and a standard wire, measured the procedural time (PT), the fluoroscopic time (FT) and the radiation exposure/area product (DAP) required to navigate through to fourteen segments. Ten wire advancements were performed per segment. RESULTS In all but two segments, the PT was significantly longer using magnetic navigation than using manual navigation. The median FT in the left main artery (LMA) - first septal segment was 7 seconds vs. 18 seconds, with magnetic and manual navigation respectively, (p=0.05); in the LMA - obtuse marginal segment the median FT was 15 seconds with magnetic navigation vs. 29.5 seconds with manual navigation, (p=0.01); in the segment from proximal right coronary artery (RCA1) to the acute marginal branch, the median FT was 8 seconds with magnetic vs. 11 seconds with manual navigation, (p=0.05); and in the RCA1 -posterior descending segment the median FT was 9.5 seconds with magnetic vs. 15 seconds with manual navigation, (p=0.006). CONCLUSION The MNS facilitates wire access to distal segments in a coronary phantom, with a reduction in FT and radiation exposure using magnetic navigation in tortuous segments.

[1]  F. Loop,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Circulation.

[2]  T. Lund,et al.  A new approach to computer-aided spine surgery: fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[3]  E. Vañó,et al.  Clinical and technical determinants of the complexity of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures: Analysis in relation to radiation exposure parameters , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  A. Jacob,et al.  A whole-body registration-free navigation system for image-guided surgery and interventional radiology. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[5]  S. Ellis,et al.  Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era , 2002, Circulation.

[6]  S. Ernst,et al.  Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation System: Magnetic Remote Catheter Ablation , 2004, Circulation.

[7]  L. Klein,et al.  Value of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stenosis morphology classification for coronary interventions in the late 1990s. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  Heart catheterization in a neonate by interacting magnetic fields: a new and simple method of catheter guidance. , 1991, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[9]  T. Ryan Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Novel, Magnetically Guided Catheter for Endocardial Mapping and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation , 2002, Circulation.

[11]  J R Roelandt,et al.  Real-Time Quantification and Display of Skin Radiation During Coronary Angiography and Intervention , 2001, Circulation.