Assessing the performance of sewer rehabilitation on the reduction of infiltration and inflow.

Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) into sewer systems is generally unwanted, because, among other things, it decreases the performance of wastewater treatment plants and increases combined sewage overflows. As sewer rehabilitation to reduce I/I is very expensive, water managers not only need methods to accurately measure I/I, but also they need sound approaches to assess the actual performance of implemented rehabilitation measures. However, such performance assessment is rarely performed. On the one hand, it is challenging to adequately take into account the variability of influential factors, such as hydro-meteorological conditions. On the other hand, it is currently not clear how experimental data can indeed support robust evidence for reduced I/I. In this paper, we therefore statistically assess the performance of rehabilitation measures to reduce I/I. This is possible by using observations in a suitable reference catchment as a control group and assessing the significance of the observed effect by regression analysis, which is well established in other disciplines. We successfully demonstrate the usefulness of the approach in a case study, where rehabilitation reduced groundwater infiltration by 23.9%. A reduction of stormwater inflow of 35.7%, however, was not statistically significant. Investigations into the experimental design of monitoring campaigns confirmed that the variability of the data as well as the number of observations collected before the rehabilitation impact the detection limit of the effect. This implies that it is difficult to improve the data quality after the rehabilitation has been implemented. Therefore, future practical applications should consider a careful experimental design. Further developments could employ more sophisticated monitoring methods, such as stable environmental isotopes, to directly observe the individual infiltration components. In addition, water managers should develop strategies to effectively communicate statistically not significant I/I reduction ratios to decision makers.

[1]  G Weiss,et al.  Infiltration and inflow in combined sewer systems: long-term analysis. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Willi Gujer,et al.  Data-driven modeling approaches to support wastewater treatment plant operation , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  C. Ray,et al.  Assessing the severity of rainfall-derived infiltration and inflow and sewer deterioration based on the flux stability of sewage markers. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Peter Krebs,et al.  Quantification of groundwater infiltration and surface water inflows in urban sewer networks based on a multiple model approach. , 2011, Water research.

[6]  H Grüning,et al.  Options and limits of quantitative and qualitative online-monitoring of industrial discharges into municipal sewage systems. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[7]  Peter Krebs,et al.  Towards a better knowledge and management of infiltration and exfiltration in sewer systems: the APUSS project , 2006 .

[8]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .

[9]  Grzegorz J. Ciach,et al.  Local Random Errors in Tipping-Bucket Rain Gauge Measurements , 2003 .

[10]  Zhiyi Zhang.  Estimating Rain Derived Inflow and Infiltration for Rainfalls of Varying Characteristics , 2007 .

[11]  Zhiyi Zhang.  Flow Data, Inflow/Infiltration Ratio, and Autoregressive Error Models , 2005 .

[12]  Dulcy M. Abraham,et al.  Assessment technologies for sewer system rehabilitation , 1998 .

[13]  D. Stránský,et al.  Sewer infiltration/inflow: long-term monitoring based on diurnal variation of pollutant mass flux. , 2009, Water Science and Technology.

[14]  Boris Sevruk,et al.  Adjustment of tipping-bucket precipitation gauge measurements , 1996 .

[15]  K. C. Patra.  Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering , 2016 .

[16]  James D. Hamilton.  Time Series Analysis , 1994 .

[17]  Zhiyi Zhang.  Nonlinear Extrapolation of Inflow and Infiltration Behavior under Heavy Storms , 2008 .

[18]  M. Klootwijk,et al.  Testing flow-meters using a field laboratory , 2008 .

[19]  Helen Brown,et al.  Applied Mixed Models in Medicine , 2000, Technometrics.

[20]  M. Gresch,et al.  A stable isotope approach for the quantification of sewer infiltration. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Robert V. Brill,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers , 2004, Technometrics.

[22]  J. Bertrand-Krajewski,et al.  Infiltration in sewer systems: comparison of measurement methods. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[23]  D. Haver,et al.  Runoff of pyrethroid insecticides from concrete surfaces following simulated and natural rainfalls. , 2012, Water research.

[24]  C. Mustin,et al.  Isotopic tracing of clear water sources in an urban sewer: A combined water and dissolved sulfate stable isotope approach. , 2010, Water research.

[25]  Joong Hoon Kim,et al.  Development of a Decision Making Support System for Efficient Rehabilitation of Sewer Systems , 2009 .

[26]  Daniel T. Larose,et al.  Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining , 2005 .

[27]  Theresa L. Utlaut,et al.  Introduction to Time Series Analysis and Forecasting , 2008 .

[28]  J. Bertrand-Krajewski,et al.  Measurement of infiltration rates in urban sewer systems by use of oxygen isotopes. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.