Dealing with LCA modeling for the end of life of mechatronic products

This paper discusses end-of-life (EoL) modeling issues in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), through the application to a domestic cooker hood. Two EoL approaches are applied and discussed, namely the avoided burden and the one recommended by the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide, presently under testing. While no case studies on PEF application have been published yet, to the best of our knowledge, the scientific community is questioning the robustness and relevance of some methodological aspects, especially the EoL formula. The objective of the work is to provide a case study for supporting the scientific discussion on EoL modeling by: applying the avoided burden approach to the cooker hood EoL; testing the PEF EoL approach on a cooker hood component, the aluminum filter, and compare the results with those obtained from the avoided burden approach; evaluating how both the approaches affect the allocation of burdens/credits associated to recycling. The Global Warming Potential (GWP) and the Abiotic Depletion Potential (ADP) impact categories are investigated. The study points out that the PEF EoL approach delivers higher environmental impacts than the avoided burden one, due to a reduced contribution from the avoided impacts. Overall, the application of the PEF EoL approach is more complex, due to the additional and often not available information needed, such as the recycled content of the materials and the disposal treatments that are avoided when recycled materials are used in the product. Also the structure of the LCA datasets may limit the application of the PEF EoL.

[1]  Gabriele Comodi,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a domestic cooker hood , 2010 .

[2]  Deepali Sinha Khetriwal,et al.  Producer responsibility for e-waste management: key issues for consideration - learning from the Swiss experience. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  J. Atherton.  Declaration by the Metals Industry on Recycling Principles , 2007 .

[4]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Open-loop recycling: Criteria for allocation procedures , 1997 .

[5]  Jun Nakatani,et al.  Life Cycle Inventory Analysis of Recycling: Mathematical and Graphical Frameworks , 2014 .

[6]  Rolf Frischknecht,et al.  LCI modelling approaches applied on recycling of materials in view of environmental sustainability, risk perception and eco-efficiency , 2010 .

[7]  Zoltan Urmosi,et al.  RECOVERY OF PRECIOUS METALS FROM WASTE ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT , 2013 .

[8]  Annekatrin Lehmann,et al.  Product environmental footprint in policy and market decisions: Applicability and impact assessment , 2015, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[9]  Gregory Giuliani,et al.  E-waste, the hidden side of IT equipment's manufacturing and use , 2005 .

[10]  Patrick Wäger,et al.  Does WEEE recycling make sense from an environmental perspective?: The environmental impacts of the Swiss take-back and recycling systems for waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) , 2005 .

[11]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Evaluation of Life Cycle Assessment Recycling Allocation Methods , 2013 .

[12]  Ardente Fulvio,et al.  Economic Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment: The State of the Art and Discussion of Examples , 2012 .

[13]  Marco Mengarelli,et al.  LCA study of a domestic cooker hood , 2015 .

[14]  P A Wäger,et al.  Environmental impacts of the Swiss collection and recovery systems for Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE): a follow-up. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Mathieux Fabrice,et al.  Integration of resource efficiency and waste management criteria in European product policies – Second phase. Report n° 1. Analysis of Durability , 2012 .

[16]  Almut Beate Heinrich,et al.  Declaration by the Metals Industry on Recycling Principles , 2007 .

[17]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Product environmental footprint—breakthrough or breakdown for policy implementation of life cycle assessment? , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Brett H Robinson,et al.  E-waste: an assessment of global production and environmental impacts. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  V. S. Rotter,et al.  Assessment of Precious Metal Flows During Preprocessing of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment , 2009 .

[20]  Steven B. Young,et al.  Metals recycling maps and allocation procedures in life cycle assessment , 2010 .

[21]  Marianne Bigum,et al.  Metal recovery from high-grade WEEE: a life cycle assessment. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  Yasuhiro Matsui,et al.  Economic evaluation of optional recycling processes for waste electronic home appliances , 2009 .

[23]  T. Ekvall.  A market-based approach to allocation at open-loop recycling , 2000 .

[24]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[25]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  Making Metals Count: Applications of Material Flow Analysis , 2006 .

[26]  Rana Pant,et al.  The European Commission Organisation Environmental Footprint method: comparison with other methods, and rationales for key requirements , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[27]  Rana Pant,et al.  Allocation solutions for secondary material production and end of life recovery: Proposals for product policy initiatives , 2014 .

[28]  M. Cellura,et al.  Economic Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment , 2012 .

[29]  Daniel Müller,et al.  Addressing sustainability in the aluminum industry: a critical review of life cycle assessments , 2012 .

[30]  Eric Forssberg,et al.  Mechanical recycling of waste electric and electronic equipment: a review. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[31]  Valentina Elena Tartiu,et al.  DRIVING FORCES OF WEEE MANAGEMENT: A PEST ANALYSIS OF ROMANIA , 2013 .