Phenotypic Basis of Reproductive Success in a Social Insect: Genetic and Social Determinants

Social insects live in societies that include both reproductive and nonreproductive adults. Understanding the factors that determine which individuals become successful reproductives is necessary to explain the evolution of these societies. The phenotypic effects of the gene Pgm-3 (or a closely linked gene) that may cause workers of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta to selectively execute all queens of a specific genotype were investigated. These effects, which involve differences in queen reproductive development, are expressed only in colonies exhibiting a particular type of social organization (multiple-queen colonies), and it is only in such colonies that selective execution on the basis of genotype occurs. This is an unusual example of genotype-environment interaction in gene expression in which the environmental component is the social environment. The queens executed are, surprisingly, those with the greatest reproductive development. Thus, there is a counterintuitive relation between the potential and realized reproductive success of queens in multiple-queen societies of this ant.

[1]  K. Chandrashekara,et al.  The role of larval nutrition in pre‐imaginal biasing of caste in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) , 1991 .

[2]  S. Porter Origins of new queens in polygyne red imported fire ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). , 1991 .

[3]  Mike Hansell,et al.  Social Insects: an Evolutionary Approach to Castes and Reproduction, Wolf Engels (Ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1990), 275 , 1991 .

[4]  C. S. Lofgren,et al.  Comparison of nestmate recognition between monogyne and polygyne populations of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). , 1990 .

[5]  E. Vargo,et al.  On the relationship between queen number and fecundity in polygyne colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta , 1989 .

[6]  E. Vargo,et al.  Colony Reproduction by Budding in the Polygyne Form of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1989 .

[7]  C. S. Lofgren,et al.  Student Symposium: Alternatives to Chemical Control of Insects: Adoption of Newly-Mated Queens: A Mechanism for Proliferation and Perpetuation of Polygynous Red Imported Fire Ants, Solenopsis Invicta Buren , 1988 .

[8]  P. Nonacs QUEEN NUMBER IN COLONIES OF SOCIAL HYMENOPTERA AS A KIN‐SELECTED ADAPTATION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  D. Fletcher,et al.  Differences in inhibitory capability among queens of the ant Solenopsis invicta , 1986 .

[10]  E. Evesham Social Insects: Ecology and Behavioural Biology, M.V. Brian. Chapman & Hall, London (1983), x, +377. Price £25.00 hardback, £12.95 paperback , 1985 .

[11]  M. Blum,et al.  Regulation of Queen Number by Workers in Colonies of Social Insects , 1983, Science.

[12]  M. Blum,et al.  Pheromonal control of dealation and oogenesis in virgin queen fire ants. , 1981, Science.

[13]  G. Allen,et al.  A SURVEY FOR PATHOGENS OF FIRE ANTS, SOLENOPSIS SPP.,' IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES , 1977 .

[14]  A. Gray Darwin on the origin of species , 1860 .

[15]  A. Bennett The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection; or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1872, Nature.

[16]  K. Ross,et al.  Strong selection on a gene that influences reproductive competition in a social insect , 1992, Nature.