Commute Time as a Method to Explore Brain Functional Connectomes

Graph theory has been extensively applied to investigate complex brain networks in current neuroscience research. Many metrics derived from graph theory, such as local and global efficiencies, are based on the path length between nodes. These approaches are commonly used in analyses of brain networks assessed by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, although relying on the strong assumption that information flow throughout the network is restricted to the shortest paths. In this study, we propose the utilization of commute time as a tool to investigate regional centrality on the functional connectome. Our initial hypothesis was that an alternative approach that considers alternative routes (such as commute time) could provide further information into the organization of functional networks. However, our empirical findings on the ADHD-200 database suggest that at the group level, the commute time and shortest path are highly correlated. In contrast, at the subject level, we discovered that commute time is much less susceptible to head motion artifacts when compared with metrics based on shortest paths. Given the overall similarity between the measures, we argue that commute time might be advantageous particularly for connectomic studies in populations where motion artifacts are a major issue.

[1]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  R Cameron Craddock,et al.  A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[4]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[5]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Development of Large-Scale Functional Brain Networks in Children , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  M. Farah,et al.  Progress and challenges in probing the human brain , 2015, Nature.

[8]  S. Bressler,et al.  Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Yong He,et al.  Toward Developmental Connectomics of the Human Brain , 2016, Front. Neuroanat..

[10]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  THE HUMAN CONNECTOME: A COMPLEX NETWORK , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[12]  O. Sporns,et al.  Organization, development and function of complex brain networks , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  O. Sporns,et al.  High-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Exploring the Morphospace of Communication Efficiency in Complex Networks , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Yong He,et al.  Age-related changes in topological patterns of large-scale brain functional networks during memory encoding and recognition , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  H. Lagercrantz,et al.  The functional architecture of the infant brain as revealed by resting-state fMRI. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Reduced resting-state brain activity in the "default network" in normal aging. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  M. Milham,et al.  The ADHD-200 Consortium: A Model to Advance the Translational Potential of Neuroimaging in Clinical Neuroscience , 2012, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[20]  Xilin Shen,et al.  Low-dimensional embedding of fMRI datasets , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  O. Sporns,et al.  Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[22]  O. Sporns,et al.  From regions to connections and networks: new bridges between brain and behavior , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[24]  Bryon A. Mueller,et al.  Altered resting state complexity in schizophrenia , 2012, NeuroImage.

[25]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[26]  George Economou,et al.  Analyzing Functional Brain Connectivity by Means of Commute Times: A New Approach and its Application to Track Event-Related Dynamics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  H. Voss,et al.  Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks , 2014, NeuroImage.

[28]  Yong He,et al.  Development of human brain structural networks through infancy and childhood. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Spreading dynamics on spatially constrained complex brain networks , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[30]  Yong He,et al.  Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.