The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Surgical technique.

BACKGROUND Acetabular fixation during revision total hip arthroplasty in patients who have a nonsupportive superior dome and proximal migration of the acetabular component (a Paprosky Type-IIIa defect) cannot be achieved reliably with use of a hemispherical porouscoated component alone. The purposes of the present study were to determine the long-term results associated with the use of a porous-coated hemispherical acetabular component, supported with a distal femoral structural allograft, for revision at the site of a Type-IIIa defect and to determine if graft resorption leads to late failure. METHODS Thirty-one patients who had an acetabular reconstruction with use of a distal femoral allograft for the treatment of a Type-IIIa defect between January 1985 and December 1990 were followed annually with clinical and radiographic evaluations. At the time of the latest follow-up, eight patients had died and one patient had been lost to follow-up. One of the patients who died had had a clinical failure at 4.5 years postoperatively and was included in the analysis. Therefore, twenty-three patients, who had had an average age of sixty-one years at the time of the index procedure, were evaluated at an average of 10.3 years postoperatively. RESULTS Five acetabular components were re-revised because of aseptic loosening at an average of 5.3 years after the index procedure. Radiographically, all but one of the remaining components were stable and showed evidence of bone ingrowth. The average Merle D'Aubigné and Postel hip score improved from 5 points preoperatively to 10 points at the time of the latest follow-up. Allograft bone resorption, although difficult to quantitate, was observed around six of the seventeen stable components and around two of the five components that failed clinically. CONCLUSIONS Acetabular revision with use of a porous-coated acetabular component along with a structural distal femoral allograft for the treatment of a Type-IIIa defect demonstrated a high rate of clinical and radiographic success after an average of ten years of follow-up.

[1]  K. Saleh,et al.  The Use of Allografts in Orthopaedic Surgery - Part II: The Role of Allografts in Revision Arthroplasty of the Hip , 2002, Instructional course lectures.

[2]  C. Sledge The Dartmouth Atlas of Musculoskeletal Health Care , 2001 .

[3]  K. Saleh,et al.  Minor Column Structural Acetabular Allografts in Revision Hip Arthroplasty , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  C. Engh,et al.  Acetabular Revision with Use of a Bilobed Component Inserted without Cement in Patients Who Have Acetabular Bone-Stock Deficiency* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  M. Müller,et al.  The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  S. Avcı,et al.  2- to 10-year follow-up study of acetabular revisions using allograft bone to repair bone defects. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  D. Garbuz,et al.  Revision of the Acetabular Component of a Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Massive Structural Allograft. Study with a Minimum Five-Year Follow-up* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  W. Paprosky,et al.  Acetabular reconstruction with massive acetabular allografts. , 1996, Instructional course lectures.

[9]  A. Gross,et al.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with shelf bulk allografts. A long-term follow-up study. , 1996, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  W. Paprosky,et al.  Acetabular defect classification: a detailed radiographic approach. , 1995, Seminars in arthroplasty.

[11]  W. Head,et al.  Dealing with the deficient acetabulum in revision hip arthroplasty. , 1995, Seminars in Arthroplasty.

[12]  S. Murphy,et al.  Acetabular reconstruction using structural grafts in total hip replacement: a 12 1/2 year follow-up. , 1995, Seminars in arthroplasty.

[13]  J. Lawrence,et al.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. , 1994, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  W. Paprosky,et al.  Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  L. Whiteside,et al.  The fate of massive allografts in total hip acetabular revision surgery. , 1992, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  W. Harris,et al.  Total hip reconstruction using frozen femoral head allografts in patients with acetabular bone loss. , 1987, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[17]  R. M. D'aubigne,et al.  Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis , 2011 .