Early Stroke and Mortality After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Percutaneous endocardial left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation who are poor candidates for oral anticoagulants. Oral anticoagulation is generally discontinued 45 days following successful LAAO. Real-world data on early stroke and mortality following LAAO are lacking. Methods: Using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical-Modification codes, we performed a retrospective observational registry analysis to examine the rates and predictors of stroke, mortality, and procedural complications during index hospitalization and 90-day readmission among 42 114 admissions in the Nationwide Readmissions Database for LAAO between 2016 and 2019. Early stroke and mortality were defined as events occurring during index admission or 90-day readmission. Data on timing of early strokes post-LAAO were collected. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to ascertain predictors of early stroke and major adverse events. Results: LAAO was associated with low rates of early stroke (0.63%), early mortality (0.53%), and procedural complications (2.59%). Among patients who had readmissions with strokes after LAAO, the median time from implant to readmission was 35 days (interquartile range, 9–57 days); 67% of readmissions with strokes occurred <45 days postimplant. Between 2016 and 2019, the rates of early stroke after LAAO significantly decreased (0.64% versus 0.46% P-for-trend <0.001), while early mortality and major adverse event rates were unchanged. Peripheral vascular disease and a history of prior stroke were independently associated with early stroke after LAAO. Early post-LAAO stroke rates were similar between low, medium, and high LAAO volume tertile centers. Conclusions: In this contemporary real-world analysis, the early stroke rate after LAAO was low, with the majority occurring within 45 days of device implantation. Despite an increase in LAAO procedures between 2016 and 2019, there with a significant decline in early strokes after LAAO during that period.

[1]  S. Mandava,et al.  TCT-92 Comparison of Procedural, Safety, and Efficacy Outcomes of Watchman FLX Versus Watchman 2.5 , 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Laura Martin,et al.  PD32-09 SOCIOECONOMIC PREDICTORS OF RECEIVING A VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY COMPARED TO OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC/ROBOTIC APPROACHES FOR TREATMENT OF APICAL PROLAPSE: AN ANALYSIS OF OVER 38,000 WOMEN IN THE HEALTHCARE COST AND UTILIZATION PROJECT (HCUP) , 2021 .

[3]  T. Kuno,et al.  Analysis of outcome of 6-month readmissions after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion , 2021, Heart.

[4]  Frederick T. Han,et al.  Sex Differences in Procedural Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Insights From the NCDR LAAO Registry. , 2021, JAMA cardiology.

[5]  V. Reddy,et al.  Primary Outcome Evaluation of a Next-Generation Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device , 2021, Circulation.

[6]  Anas M. Saad,et al.  Association of Hospital Procedural Volume With Outcomes of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  M. Price,et al.  The NCDR Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Registry. , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  E. Heist,et al.  Incidence and Causes of In-hospital Outcomes and 30-day Readmissions After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A United States Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study Using Claims Data. , 2020, Heart rhythm.

[9]  D. Delurgio,et al.  Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Continued Access Left Atrial Appendage Closure Registries. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  S. Markowitz,et al.  Risk of Mortality Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  H. Kamel,et al.  Sex-based differences in outcomes, 30-day readmissions, and costs following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the United States Nationwide Readmissions Database 2010-14. , 2019, European heart journal.

[12]  R. Swaminathan,et al.  Thirty‐Day Readmission Rates, Timing, Causes, and Costs after ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States: A National Readmission Database Analysis 2010–2014 , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[13]  Saibal Kar,et al.  5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  S. Kische,et al.  Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN in patients with or without contraindication to oral anticoagulation: 1-Year follow-up outcome data of the EWOLUTION trial. , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[15]  R. Virmani,et al.  Left atrial appendage obliteration: mechanisms of healing and intracardiac integration. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  Maurice Buchbinder,et al.  Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[17]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. , 2007, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[19]  Valentin Fuster,et al.  American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy. , 2003, Circulation.

[20]  J. Odell,et al.  Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  N. Ammash,et al.  Left atrial appendage thrombus is not uncommon in patients with acute atrial fibrillation and a recent embolic event: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  W. Daniel,et al.  Assessment of left atrial appendage function by biplane transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: identification of a subgroup of patients at increased embolic risk. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.