Quantification and applications of identification spheres

Although the concept of identification has been studied and used in many research areas, including psychology, political science, economics, management science, etc., there is no specific quantitative approach. In this article, we propose a quantitative approach to study the identification conception. Specifically, based on the definition of identification sphere of Habitual Domains Theory, we define and explain the concepts of identification function, degree of identification, identification matrices, identification spheres and dis-identification spheres. The quantitative concepts are then applied to formulate the mathematical models of election of a social group leader. The models consider both degree of identification and that of dis-identification. Different models lead to different results, which enrich our thinking about election. We also introduce mathematical program- ming models, utilizing identification matrices, and thresholds of identification, to find an optimal combination of key members to influence all targets in a social group. The results are important for marketing promotion of a new product, service or that of a new concept.

[1]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Knowledge-information autopoietic cycle: towards the wisdom systems , 2006 .

[2]  P. Herr,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective , 1991 .

[3]  J. Sandler,et al.  Projection, Identification, Projective Identification , 1987 .

[4]  P. Yu Multiple-Criteria Decision Making: "Concepts, Techniques, And Extensions" , 2012 .

[5]  N. Lee,et al.  Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network , 2007 .

[6]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[7]  Peter Adler Role conflict and identity salience: College athletics and the academic role , 1987 .

[8]  Frederick E. Webster,et al.  Informal Communication in Industrial Markets , 1970 .

[9]  Peter Fingar,et al.  Enterprise E-Commerce , 2000 .

[10]  Po-Lung Yu,et al.  Forming Winning Strategies: An Integrated Theory of Habitual Domains , 1990 .

[11]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Relational Identity and Identification: Defining Ourselves Through Work Relationships , 2007 .

[12]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Po L. Yu,et al.  Forming Winning Strategies , 1990 .

[14]  Arend Lijphart Constitutional Choices for New Democracies , 1995 .

[15]  M. Larbani,et al.  n-Person Second-Order Games: A Paradigm Shift in Game Theory , 2011, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[16]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Evidence toward an expanded model of organizational identification , 2004 .

[17]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Strategy and strategic action in the global era: overcoming the knowing-doing gap , 2008, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[18]  Po-Lung Yu,et al.  Behavior Bases and Habitual Domains of Human Decision/Behavior — Concepts and Applications , 1980 .

[19]  P. L. Yu,et al.  Habitual Domains , 1991, Oper. Res..

[20]  Po-Lung Yu,et al.  Stable habitual domains: existence and implications , 1985 .

[21]  Pippa Norris,et al.  Choosing Electoral Systems: Proportional, Majoritarian and Mixed Systems , 1997 .