Selection for Optimal Life Histories: The Effects of Age Structure

The theory of optimal reproductive strategies has traditionally been studied in two ways: formal analysis of simple models that neglect the effects of age structure, and computer studies of complex life histories. Each of these approaches has disadvantages. The consequences of simple models sometimes dependmore on the nature of the simplifying assumptions than on the biological issues in question. On the other hand, computer simulations are only as general as the examples considered. The present study seeks to extend the formal analysis of optimal life histories to complex cases. I show that an optimal life history maximizes for each age class the expected fecundity at that age plus the sum of all future expected parameters. This result enables us to determine, at least inthe case of a three—stage life history, the manner in which the optimal reproductive effort at each age depends on the efforts made at the other ages, and thus, the coevolution of the various age—specific efforts. Three cases are distinguished: (1) If fertility and post—breeding survival and growth are concave functions of reproductive effort (i.e., have second derivatives that areeverywhere negative) there is a single set of age—specific reproductive rates towhich the system evolves regardless of initial conditions. This set of reproductive rates corresponds to an iteroparous life history (repeated breeding at different ages). (2) On the other hand, if fertility and subsequent growth and survival are convex functions of effort (positive second derivatives), semelparity (a single, herculean reproductive effort, followed by death) will most often evolve. However, an alternative, iteroparous life history sometimes exists, although stability considerations suggest that it may be transitory. (3)More realistic fertility and growth survival functions can generate alternative reproductive strategies that are stable since each represents a local maximum infitness. Often one of these alternatives corresponds to semelparity, the second to repeated reproduction. In such cases, the evolutionary outcome depends on initial conditions. This suggests that related species, with similar ecologies, may have very different life histories, the differences resulting from historical accidents that have trapped each on a different adaptive peak. The Salmonid genera, Salmo and Oncorhynchus, are suggested as possible examples.

[1]  D. Goodman Natural Selection and a Cost Ceiling on Reproductive Effort , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[2]  E. Charnov,et al.  Life-History Consequences of Natural Selection: Cole's Result Revisited , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[3]  W. Schaffer,et al.  CHANGING REPRODUCTIVE RATES AND POPULATION CYCLES IN LEMMINGS AND VOLES , 1973, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  R. Fagen An Optimal Life-History Strategy in which Reproductive Effort Decreases with Age , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[5]  D. Hussell Factors Affecting Clutch Size in Arctic Passerines , 1972 .

[6]  Madhav Gadgil,et al.  The Concept of r- and K-Selection: Evidence from Wild Flowers and Some Theoretical Considerations , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[7]  A. L. Meister,et al.  Fecundity of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) from Two Maine Rivers , 1971 .

[8]  E. H. Bryant Life History Consequences of Natural Selection: Cole's Result , 1971, The American Naturalist.

[9]  N. Hairston,et al.  Natural selection and the parameters of population growth. , 1970 .

[10]  J. Emlen,et al.  Age Specificity and Ecological Theory , 1970 .

[11]  William H. Bossert,et al.  Life Historical Consequences of Natural Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[12]  D. Tinkle The Concept of Reproductive Effort and Its Relation to the Evolution of Life Histories of Lizards , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[13]  G. I. Murphy Pattern in Life History and the Environment , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Nathan Keyfitz,et al.  Introduction to the mathematics of population , 1968 .

[15]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[16]  Peter L. Balise,et al.  Mathematics for Scientists , 1967 .

[17]  G. Caughley Mortality Patterns in Mammals , 1966 .

[18]  M. Cody,et al.  A GENERAL THEORY OF CLUTCH SIZE , 1966, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  R. Bellman,et al.  Applied Dynamic Programming , 1965 .

[20]  H. Barnes SO‐CALLED ANECDYSIS IN BALANUS BALANOIDES AND THE EFFECT OF BREEDING UPON THE GROWTH OF THE CALCAREOUS SHELL OF SOME COMMON BARNACLES , 1962 .

[21]  L. C. Cole The Population Consequences of Life History Phenomena , 1954, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[22]  D. Lack The natural regulation of animal numbers , 1954 .

[23]  L. Birch,et al.  The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population , 1948 .

[24]  E. Deevey Life Tables for Natural Populations of Animals , 1947, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[25]  P. H. Leslie On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. , 1945, Biometrika.

[26]  D. L. Belding The Number of Eggs and Pyloric Appendages as Criteria of River Varieties of the Atlantic Salmon (Salmo Salar) , 1940 .

[27]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1931 .