Remote monitoring of patients with implanted devices: data exchange and integration

Background Remote follow-up of implanted implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) may offer a solution to the problem of overcrowded outpatient clinics, and may also be effective in detecting clinical events early. Data obtained from remote follow up systems, as developed by all major device companies, are stored in a central database system, operated and owned by the device company. A problem now arises that the patient's clinical information is partly stored in the local electronic health record (EHR) system in the hospital, and partly in the remote monitoring database, which may potentially result in patient safety issues. Methods To address the requirement of integrating remote monitoring data in the local EHR, the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Implantable Device Cardiac Observation (IDCO) profile has been developed. This IHE IDCO profile has been adapted by all major device companies. Results In our hospital, we have implemented the IHE IDCO profile to import data from the remote databases from two device vendors into the departmental Cardiology Information System (EPD-Vision). Data is exchanged via a HL7/XML communication protocol, as defined in the IHE IDCO profile. Conclusions By implementing the IHE IDCO profile, we have been able to integrate the data from the remote monitoring databases in our local EHRs. It can be expected that remote monitoring systems will develop into dedicated monitoring and therapy platforms. Data retrieved from these systems should form an integral part of the electronic patient record as more and more out-patient clinic care will shift to personalized care provided at a distance, in other words at the patient's home.

[1]  Silvia G Priori,et al.  HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations: developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  Renato Pietro Ricci,et al.  Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  Gillian D Sanders,et al.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators versus Quarterly Device Interrogations in Clinic: Results from a Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[4]  Dominique Lacroix,et al.  Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator leads under advisory , 2010, European heart journal.

[5]  M. Linnaluoto,et al.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  Hugo A Katus,et al.  Cost savings and safety of ICD remote control by telephone: a prospective, observational study , 2010, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.