GOCE Data Processing: The Spherical Cap Regularization Approach

Due to the sun-synchronous orbit of the satellite gravity gradiometry mission GOCE, the measurements will not be globally available. As a consequence, using a set of base functions with global support such as spherical harmonics, the matrix of normal equations tends to be ill-conditioned, leading to weakly determined low-order spherical harmonic coefficients. The corresponding geopotential strongly oscillates at the poles.Considering the special configuration of the GOCE mission, in order to stabilize the normal equations matrix, the Spherical Cap Regularization Approach (SCRA) has been developed. In this approach the geopotential function at the poles is predescribed by an analytical continuous function, which is defined solely in the spatially restricted polar regions. This function could either be based on an existing gravity field model or, alternatively, a low-degree gravity field solution which is adjusted from GOCE observations. Consequently the inversion process is stabilized.The feasibility of the SCRA is evaluated based on a numerical closed-loop simulation, using a realistic GOCE mission scenario. Compared with standard methods such as Kaula and Tikhonov regularization, the SCRA shows a considerably improved performance.

[1]  R. Koop,et al.  High Level Processing Facility for GOCE: products and processing strategy , 2004 .

[2]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[3]  Monika Korte,et al.  Regularization of spherical cap harmonics , 2003 .

[4]  F. Sansò,et al.  Band-limited functions on a bounded spherical domain: the Slepian problem on the sphere , 1999 .

[5]  J. Bouman Quality assessment of satellite-based global gravity field models , 2000 .

[6]  Nico Sneeuw,et al.  The polar gap , 1997 .

[7]  W. M. Kaula,et al.  Theory of Satellite Geodesy: Applications of Satellites to Geodesy , 2000 .

[8]  Roland Pail GOCE Quick-Look Gravity Field Analysis: Treatment of Gravity Gradients Defined in the Gradiometer Reference Frame , 2004 .

[9]  Gernot Plank,et al.  Spatially restricted data distributions on the sphere: the method of orthonormalized functions and applications , 2001 .

[10]  Roland Pail In-orbit Calibration and Local Gravity Field Continuation Problem , 2002 .

[11]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter , 1979, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[12]  P. Meissl A Study of Covariance Functions Related to the Earth's Disturbing Potential. , 1971 .

[13]  F. Sansò,et al.  Data gaps in finite-dimensional boundary value problems for satellite gradiometry , 2001 .

[14]  N. Sneeuw A Semi-Analytical Approach to Gravity Field Analysis from Satellite Observations , 2000 .

[15]  C. Hwang Orthogonal functions over the oceans and applications to the determination of orbit error, geoid and sea surface topography from satellite altimetry / , 1991 .

[16]  J. Kusche,et al.  Regularization of gravity field estimation from satellite gravity gradients , 2002 .

[17]  C. Readings,et al.  Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission , 1996 .

[18]  Roland Pail,et al.  GOCE Quick-Look Gravity Solution: Application of the Semianalytic Approach in the Case of Data Gaps and Non-Repeat Orbits , 2003 .

[19]  F. Sansò,et al.  Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry , 1993 .

[20]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  REGULARIZATION OF INCORRECTLY POSED PROBLEMS , 1963 .

[21]  Gernot Plank,et al.  GOCE Gravity Field Processing Strategy , 2004 .

[22]  Richard H. Rapp,et al.  The Ohio State 1991 geopotential and sea surface topography harmonic coefficient models , 1991 .

[23]  Roland Klees,et al.  Computation of spherical harmonic coefficients from gravity gradiometry data to be acquired by the GOCE satellite: regularization issues , 2003 .

[24]  Peiliang Xu,et al.  Determination of surface gravity anomalies using gradiometric observables , 1992 .

[25]  H. Moritz Advanced Physical Geodesy , 1980 .

[26]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96 , 1998 .

[27]  Fernando Sansò,et al.  Space-wise approach to satellite gravity field determination in the presence of coloured noise , 2004 .

[28]  Roland Pail,et al.  GOCE SGG and SST quick-look gravity field analysis , 2003 .

[29]  Gernot Plank,et al.  Assessment of three numerical solution strategies for gravity field recovery from GOCE satellite gravity gradiometry implemented on a parallel platform , 2002 .

[30]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[31]  A. E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems , 2000 .

[32]  V. A. Morozov,et al.  Methods for Solving Incorrectly Posed Problems , 1984 .

[33]  Christopher Jekeli,et al.  Efficient gravity field recovery using in situ disturbing potential observables from CHAMP , 2002 .

[34]  N. Sneeuw,et al.  Global spherical harmonic computation by two-dimensional Fourier methods , 1996 .

[35]  J. Kusche,et al.  Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components , 2002 .