Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance

Abstract We explain why some firms voluntarily overcomply with environmental regulation. In our model all consumers value environmental quality but differ in their willingness to pay which depends on their income levels. Publicly available information on environmental performance of firms enables consumers to identify clean firms. Firms participate in a two-stage duopoly game where they first choose their levels of cleaning technology and next engage in price competition. The market gets segmented by income levels. A minimum standard binding on the dirty firm has the effect of improving the performance of the cleaner firm. A subsidy obtains the same competitive outcome.

[1]  M. Maloney,et al.  A Positive Theory of Environmental Quality Regulation , 1982, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[2]  Clifford S. Russell,et al.  Enforcing Pollution Control Laws , 1986 .

[3]  Tom Tietenberg,et al.  Emissions Trading: An Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy , 1985 .

[4]  Frances Cairncross,et al.  Costing the Earth , 1991 .

[5]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[6]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  An Experiment in Voluntary Environmental Regulation: Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program , 1995 .

[7]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Price competition, quality and income disparities , 1979 .

[8]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[9]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Economic incentives for environmental protection: Integrating theory and practice , 1992 .

[10]  Motoshige Itoh Monopoly, product differentiation and economic welfare , 1983 .

[11]  B. Smart,et al.  Beyond Compliance: A New Industry View of the Environment , 1992 .

[12]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  The Net Benefits of Incentive-Based Regulation: A Case Study of Environmental Standard Setting , 1989 .

[13]  Paul B. Downing Environmental economics and policy , 1984 .

[14]  Alan S. Blinder Hard heads, soft hearts , 1987 .

[15]  S. Lindenberg Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Organization Studies , 1993 .

[16]  Winston Harrington,et al.  Enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted , 1988 .

[17]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .