Quantification in clinical fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly used clinically to provide functional information on disease processes, especially in oncology using the glucose analogue 2-[ 1 8 F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ( 1 8 F-FDG). In the clinical setting it has become standard practice to use simplified imaging protocols compared to the often complex methods developed for research using PET. This is partly due to scarcity of resources but also for reasons of patient comfort and compliance, and not least expense and patient throughput. Fortunately the resulting loss in information can be justified to some extent on the grounds that in clinical PET It is usually relative rather than absolute metabolic rates that are of interest. Nonetheless, there remain unresolved questions of how best to perform quantification in clinical PET.

[1]  J A Thie,et al.  Clarification of a fractional uptake concept. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  R L Wahl,et al.  Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. , 1993, Radiology.

[3]  U Ruotsalainen,et al.  Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer--a PET study. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  David L Hastings,et al.  SUVpeak: a new parameter for quantification of uptake in FDG PET , 2004 .

[5]  G. Glatting,et al.  FDG PET: elevated plasma glucose reduces both uptake and detection rate of pancreatic malignancies. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  S. Libutti,et al.  Comparison of SUV and Patlak slope for monitoring of cancer therapy using serial PET scans , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  Does diabetes affect [18F]FDG standardised uptake values in lung cancer? , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  H. Parkes,et al.  Tissue‐specific differences in 2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxyglucose metabolism beyond FDG‐6‐P: a 19F NMR spectroscopy study in the rat , 2003, NMR in biomedicine.

[9]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Tomographic measurement of local cerebral glucose metabolic rate in humans with (F‐18)2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose: Validation of method , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[10]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[11]  A. Alavi,et al.  Can the standardized uptake value characterize primary brain tumors on FDG-PET? , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  P. Ell,et al.  Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology. , 2001, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  E. Rota Kops,et al.  The influence of plasma glucose levels on fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in bronchial carcinomas. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Paul K. Marsden,et al.  Effect of corrections for blood glucose and body size on [18F]FDG PET standardised uptake values in lung cancer , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  A. Alavi,et al.  Dual time point fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a potential method to differentiate malignancy from inflammation and normal tissue in the head and neck , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  R. Coleman,et al.  The prognostic significance of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[17]  L M Hamberg,et al.  The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or oversimplification? , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  G. Lucignani,et al.  Assessing anti-cancer treatment by positron emission tomography: primum non nocere , 2004, Nuclear medicine communications.

[19]  Y. Erdi,et al.  Standardized uptake value in pediatric patients: an investigation to determine the optimum measurement parameter , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  Yuji Nakamoto,et al.  Reproducibility of common semi-quantitative parameters for evaluating lung cancer glucose metabolism with positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[21]  M. O'Doherty,et al.  Evaluation of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose whole body positron emission tomography imaging in the staging of lung cancer. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[22]  Semra Ozdemir,et al.  Lean body mass-based standardized uptake value, derived from a predictive equation, might be misleading in PET studies , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  A. Alavi,et al.  Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[24]  Y. Menda,et al.  A threshold method to improve standardized uptake value reproducibility , 2000, Nuclear medicine communications.

[25]  P. Marsden,et al.  A PET study of 18FDG uptake in soft tissue masses , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Gary T. Smith,et al.  Optimizing imaging time for improved performance in oncology PET studies. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[27]  D. Visvikis,et al.  CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [18F]FDG uptake in PET , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[30]  V. Dhawan,et al.  Noninvasive quantitative fluorodeoxyglucose PET studies with an estimated input function derived from a population-based arterial blood curve. , 1993, Radiology.

[31]  J. Keyes SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value? , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  C. Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[33]  A. Lammertsma,et al.  Monitoring response to therapy in cancer using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose and positron emission tomography: an overview of different analytical methods , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  A. Alavi,et al.  Standardized uptake values of FDG: body surface area correction is preferable to body weight correction. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  L M Hamberg,et al.  Simplified measurement of deoxyglucose utilization rate. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Tumor metabolic rates in sarcoma using FDG PET. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.