Are three diagnoses always better than one?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Morin,et al. Techniques and parameters for estimating radiation exposure and dose in cardiac computed tomography , 2005, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
[2] A. A. Knecht. EVALUATION OF A , 1972 .
[3] J. Brink,et al. Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross-sectional imaging. , 1996, Radiology.
[4] G. Raff,et al. Use of multislice CT for the evaluation of emergency room patients with chest pain: The so‐called “Triple rule‐out” , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[5] W. Baxt,et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.
[6] J. Jeudy,et al. Triple rule-out and dedicated coronary artery CTA: comparison of coronary artery image quality. , 2009, Academic radiology.
[7] E. Halpern,et al. Evaluation of a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol: use of 64-Section CT in low-to-moderate risk emergency department patients suspected of having acute coronary syndrome. , 2008, Radiology.
[8] Shaoxiong Zhang,et al. Comparison of image quality and arterial enhancement with a dedicated coronary CTA protocol versus a triple rule-out coronary CTA protocol. , 2009, Academic radiology.
[9] Borut Marincek,et al. Triple rule-out CT in patients with suspicion of acute pulmonary embolism: findings and accuracy. , 2009, Academic radiology.
[10] S. Werns,et al. Emergency Cardiac CT for Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Coronary, Pulmonary, and Aortic Image Quality , 2009 .
[11] E. Halpern,et al. Radiation dose in a "triple rule-out" coronary CT angiography protocol of emergency department patients using 64-MDCT: the impact of ECG-based tube current modulation on age, sex, and body mass index. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.