Generalized image deconvolution by exploiting spatially variant point spread functions

An optical imaging system forms an object image by recollecting light scattered by the object. However, intact optical information of the object delivered through the imaging system is deteriorated by imperfect optical elements and unwanted defects. Image deconvolution, also known as inverse filtering, has been widely exploited as a recovery technique because of its practical feasibility, and operates by assuming the linear shift-invariant property of the imaging system. However, shift invariance is not rigorously hold in all imaging situations and it is not a necessary condition for solving the inverse problem of light propagation. Here, we present a method to solve the linear inverse problem of coherent light propagation without assuming shift invariance. Full characterization of imaging capability of the system is achieved by successively recording optical responses, using various laser illumination angles which are systematically controlled by a digital micro-mirror device. Experimental results show that image distortions caused by optical defocus can be restored by conventional deconvolution, but severe aberrations produced by a tilted lens or an inserted disordered layer can be corrected only by the proposed generalized image deconvolution. This work generalizes the theory of optical imaging and deconvolution, and enables distortion-free imaging under any general imaging condition.

[1]  Amanda J Wright,et al.  Adaptive optics for deeper imaging of biological samples. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[2]  J. Bertolotti,et al.  Non-invasive imaging through opaque scattering layers , 2012, Nature.

[3]  R. G. Zech,et al.  A posteriori image-correcting ''deconvolution'' by holographic Fourier-transform division. , 1967 .

[4]  Feng,et al.  Correlations and fluctuations of coherent wave transmission through disordered media. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[5]  S. Popoff,et al.  Controlling light through optical disordered media: transmission matrix approach , 2011, 1107.5285.

[6]  Martin J. Booth,et al.  Adaptive optical microscopy: the ongoing quest for a perfect image , 2014, Light: Science & Applications.

[7]  A. Nehorai,et al.  Deconvolution methods for 3-D fluorescence microscopy images , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[8]  O. Katz,et al.  Looking around corners and through thin turbid layers in real time with scattered incoherent light , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[9]  H. Cao,et al.  Enhancing light transmission through a disordered waveguide with inhomogeneous scattering and loss , 2016, 1610.06881.

[10]  W H Lee,et al.  Binary computer-generated holograms. , 1979, Applied optics.

[11]  Meng Cui,et al.  High-resolution in vivo imaging of mouse brain through the intact skull , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  S. Gigan,et al.  Point-spread-function engineering through a complex medium , 2016, 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC).

[13]  D. Rawlins,et al.  The point‐spread function of a confocal microscope: its measurement and use in deconvolution of 3‐D data , 1991 .

[14]  YongKeun Park,et al.  Real-time quantitative phase imaging with a spatial phase-shifting algorithm. , 2011, Optics letters.

[15]  C. Depeursinge,et al.  Microscopy image resolution improvement by deconvolution of complex fields. , 2010, Optics express.

[16]  S. Gigan,et al.  Light fields in complex media: Mesoscopic scattering meets wave control , 2017, 1702.05395.

[17]  S. Popoff,et al.  Measuring the transmission matrix in optics: an approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[18]  YongKeun Park,et al.  Recent advances in wavefront shaping techniques for biomedical applications , 2015, 1502.05475.

[19]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Deconvolution in Astronomy: A Review , 2002 .

[20]  B. Frieden Restoring with maximum likelihood and maximum entropy. , 1972, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[22]  Erika Pastrana,et al.  Adaptive optics for biological imaging , 2011, Nature Methods.

[23]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  Solving inverse scattering problems in biological samples by quantitative phase imaging , 2016 .

[24]  Martin J. Booth,et al.  Modelling of multi-conjugate adaptive optics for spatially variant aberrations in microscopy , 2013 .

[25]  Jin Man Kim,et al.  Optogenetic control of cell signaling pathway through scattering skull using wavefront shaping , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Marc Reinig,et al.  High-speed scanning interferometric focusing by fast measurement of binary transmission matrix for channel demixing. , 2015, Optics express.

[27]  A. Mosk,et al.  Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media. , 2007, Optics letters.

[28]  Michael S Feld,et al.  Overcoming the diffraction limit using multiple light scattering in a highly disordered medium. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[29]  Wilhelm Burger,et al.  Digital Image Processing - An Algorithmic Introduction using Java , 2008, Texts in Computer Science.

[30]  M. Booth Adaptive optics in microscopy. , 2003, Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences.

[31]  G. Lerosey,et al.  Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[32]  YongKeun Park,et al.  Active illumination using a digital micromirror device for quantitative phase imaging. , 2015, Optics letters.

[33]  YongKeun Park,et al.  Measuring large optical transmission matrices of disordered media. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[34]  J. Colsher,et al.  Fully-three-dimensional positron emission tomography , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  J. Conchello,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging by deconvolution microscopy. , 1999, Methods.

[36]  Jonghee Yoon,et al.  Measuring optical transmission matrices by wavefront shaping. , 2015, Optics express.

[37]  Yongkeun Park,et al.  Subwavelength light focusing using random nanoparticles , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[38]  P. Marquet,et al.  Marker-free phase nanoscopy , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[39]  M. Fink,et al.  Non-invasive single-shot imaging through scattering layers and around corners via speckle correlations , 2014, Nature Photonics.