The impact of value-directed remembering on the own-race bias.

Learners demonstrate superior recognition of faces of their own race or ethnicity, compared to faces of other races or ethnicities; a finding termed the own-race bias. Accounts of the own-race bias differ on whether the effect reflects acquired expertise with own-race faces or enhanced motivation to individuate own-race faces. Learners have previously been motivated to demonstrate increased recall for highly important items through a value-based paradigm, in which item importance is designated using high (vs. low) point values. Learners receive point values by correctly recalling the corresponding items at test, and are given the goal of achieving a high total point score. In two experiments we examined whether a value-based paradigm can motivate learners to differentiate between other-race faces, reducing or eliminating the own-race bias. In Experiment 1, participants studied own- and other-race faces paired with high or low point values. High point values (12-point) indicated that face was highly important to learn, whereas low point values (1-point) indicated that face was less important to learn. Participants demonstrated increased recognition for high-value own-race (but not other-race) faces, suggesting that motivation alone is not enough to reduce the own-race bias. In Experiment 2, we examined whether participants could use value to enhance recognition when permitted to self-pace their study. Recognition did not differ between high-value own- and other-race faces, reducing the own-race bias. Such data suggest that motivation can influence the own-race bias when participants can control encoding.

[1]  Alan D Castel,et al.  Memory for general and specific value information in younger and older adults: Measuring the limits of strategic control , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[2]  J. Brigham,et al.  Recognition of Faces: Own-Race Bias, Incentive, and Time Delay1 , 1982 .

[3]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Children's face recognition memory: more evidence for the cross-race effect. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Nicholas C. Soderstrom,et al.  The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Christopher N. Wahlheim,et al.  Remembering change: The critical role of recursive remindings in proactive effects of memory , 2012, Memory & Cognition.

[6]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  Social categorization and stereotyping: How social categorization biases person perception and face memory. , 2008 .

[7]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  On the dynamic nature of response criterion in recognition memory: effects of base rate, awareness, and feedback. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  BRIEF REPORT Betting on Memory Leads to Metacognitive Improvement by Younger and Older Adults , 2011 .

[10]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Individual differences in adaptive coding of face identity are linked to individual differences in face recognition ability. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  The own-age bias in face recognition: a meta-analytic and theoretical review. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Is the enhancement of memory due to reward driven by value or salience? , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[13]  K. Hugenberg,et al.  Power, individuation, and the cross-race recognition deficit , 2010 .

[14]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Monitoring and Control of Learning Own-Race and Other-Race Faces , 2013 .

[15]  Alan D. Castel,et al.  The Adaptive and Strategic Use of Memory By Older Adults: Evaluative Processing and Value-Directed Remembering , 2007 .

[16]  Peter J. Hills,et al.  Short Article: Reducing the Own-Race Bias in Face Recognition by Shifting Attention , 2006 .

[17]  J. Brigham,et al.  Cross-racial Recognition and Age: When You're Over 60, Do They Still "All Look Alike?" , 1979 .

[18]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  They All Look the Same to Me (Unless They're Angry) , 2006, Psychological science.

[19]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  How do students improve their value-based learning with task experience? , 2015, Memory.

[22]  D. Levin Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Vanessa M. Loaiza,et al.  Rapid communication: The fate of being forgotten: Information that is initially forgotten is judged as less important , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[25]  D. Balota,et al.  Memory efficiency and the strategic control of attention at encoding: impairments of value-directed remembering in Alzheimer's disease. , 2009, Neuropsychology.

[26]  K. Hugenberg,et al.  The Allure of Status: High-Status Targets Are Privileged in Face Processing and Memory , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[27]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit : Toward a solution to an insidious problem , 2007 .

[28]  D. Wright,et al.  An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[29]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Toward a general model of self-regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time. , 1999 .

[30]  Christian A Meissner,et al.  Recognizing faces across continents: The effect of within-race variations on the own-race bias in face recognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Reginald B. Adams,et al.  Not so black and white: memory for ambiguous group members. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  The categorization-individuation model: an integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. , 2010, Psychological review.

[33]  Aaron S. Benjamin,et al.  Metacognitive control of the spacing of study repetitions , 2006 .

[34]  False memory and importance: Can we prioritize encoding without consequence? , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[35]  K. Hugenberg,et al.  Class, Race, and the Face: Social Context Modulates the Cross-Race Effect in Face Recognition , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[36]  M. Kubovy,et al.  The effects of payoffs and prior probabilities on indices of performance and cutoff location in recognition memory , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[37]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[38]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  The Cross-Category Effect , 2007, Psychological science.

[39]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Why Some Faces won't be Remembered: Brain Potentials Illuminate Successful Versus Unsuccessful Encoding for Same-Race and Other-Race Faces , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[40]  R. Bjork,et al.  Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time , 2014 .

[41]  S. Gaertner,et al.  Where the division lies: Common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial-recognition effect , 2010 .

[42]  C. Pallier,et al.  Reversibility of the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition During Childhood , 2005, Psychological science.

[43]  K. Hugenberg,et al.  Individuation Motivation and Face Experience Can Operate Jointly to Produce the Own-Race Bias , 2012 .

[44]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Does perceived race affect discrimination and recognition of ambiguous-race faces? A test of the sociocognitive hypothesis. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  Scott H. Fraundorf,et al.  Same faces, different labels: Generating the cross-race effect in face memory with social category information , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[47]  Masataka Watanabe,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Awareness of Central Luminance Edge Is Crucial for the Craik-o'brien-cornsweet Effect , 2022 .

[48]  A. Castel,et al.  Betting on memory leads to metacognitive improvement by younger and older adults. , 2011, Psychology and aging.

[49]  Michael C. Friedman,et al.  Selecting valuable information to remember: age-related differences and similarities in self-regulated learning. , 2013, Psychology and aging.

[50]  Jonathan G Tullis,et al.  Self-pacing study of faces of different races: metacognitive control over study does not eliminate the cross-race recognition effect , 2014, Memory & cognition.

[51]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study? , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[52]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. , 2001 .

[53]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  Perception and Motivation in Face Recognition , 2012, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[54]  David A. Butz,et al.  Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach , 2005 .

[55]  Saul M. Kassin,et al.  The "general acceptance" of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. , 1989 .

[56]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A Region of Proximal Learning Model of Study Time Allocation Journal of Memory and Language , 2005 .

[57]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[58]  D. Balota,et al.  The development of memory efficiency and value-directed remembering across the life span: a cross-sectional study of memory and selectivity. , 2011, Developmental psychology.

[59]  A. Castel,et al.  Memory capacity, selective control, and value-directed remembering in children with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). , 2011, Neuropsychology.

[60]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Aaron S Benjamin,et al.  The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall , 2002, Memory & cognition.