Corrected high-frame rate anchored ultrasound with software alignment.

PURPOSE To improve lingual ultrasound imaging with the corrected high frame rate anchored ultrasound with software alignment (CHAUSA; Miller, 2008) method. METHOD A production study of the IsiXhosa alveolar click is presented. Articulatory-to-acoustic alignment is demonstrated using a Tri-Modal 3-ms pulse generator. Images from 2 simultaneous data collection paths, using dominant ultrasound technology and the CHAUSA method, are compared. The probe stabilization and head movement correction paradigm is demonstrated. RESULTS The CHAUSA method increases the frame rate from the standard National Television System Committee (NTSC) video rate (29.97) to the ultrasound internal machine rate--in this case, 124 frames per second (fps)--by using Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM; National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2008) data transfer. DICOM avoids spatiotemporal inaccuracies introduced by dominant ultrasound export techniques. The data display alignment of the acoustic and articulatory signals to the correct high-frame rate (FR) frame (± 4 ms at 124 fps). CONCLUSIONS CHAUSA produces high-FR, high-spatial-quality ultrasound images, which are head corrected to 1 mm. The method reveals tongue dorsum retraction during the posterior release of the alveolar click and tongue tip recoil following the anterior release of the alveolar click, both of which were previously undetectable. CHAUSA visualizes most of the tongue in studies of dynamic consonants with a major reduction in field problems, opening up important areas of speech research.

[1]  Alan A. Wrench,et al.  Spatio-temporal inaccuracies of video-based ultrasound imagesof the tongue. , 2006 .

[2]  Bryan Gick,et al.  The use of ultrasound for linguistic phonetic fieldwork , 2002, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[3]  Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson,et al.  The Haskins optically corrected ultrasound system (HOCUS). , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  Maureen Stone,et al.  The tongue stops here: ultrasound imaging of the palate (L). , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. Stone,et al.  Three-dimensional tongue surface shapes of English consonants and vowels. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Lisa Davidson Comparing tongue shapes from ultrasound imaging using smoothing spline analysis of variance. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Amanda L. Miller Tongue body and tongue root shape differences in N|uu clicks correlate with phonotactic patterns , 2010 .

[8]  Kimberly Diane Thomas-Vilakati Coproduction and Coarticulation in IsiZulu Clicks , 2010 .

[9]  B. Gick,et al.  Speech habilitation of hard of hearing adolescents using electropalatography and ultrasound as evaluated by trained listeners , 2003, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[10]  James Lubker,et al.  Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predict , 1977 .

[11]  M. Stone A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[12]  C. Kambhamettu,et al.  Automatic contour tracking in ultrasound images , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[13]  Amanda L. Miller Click Cavity Formation and Dissolution in IsiXhosa: Viewing Clicks with High- Speed Ultrasound , 2009 .

[14]  J. Scobbie,et al.  High-speed Cineloop Ultrasound vs. Video Ultrasound Tongue Imaging: Comparison of Front and Back Lingual Gesture Location and Relative Timing , 2008 .

[15]  Sun-Young Oh,et al.  Toward universals in the gestural organization of syllables: A cross-linguistic study of liquids , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[16]  Amanda L. Miller,et al.  Differences in airstream and posterior place of articulation among Nǀuu clicks , 2009, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[17]  M Stone,et al.  A head and transducer support system for making ultrasound images of tongue/jaw movement. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Chandra Kambhamettu,et al.  Tongue motion averaging from contour sequences , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[19]  Jeff Mielke,et al.  Palatron: a technique for aligning ultrasound images of the tongue and palate , 2005 .

[20]  Anthony Traill,et al.  Phonetic and phonological studies of ¡Xoo Bushman , 1981 .

[21]  James M Scobbie,et al.  Head-Probe Stabilisation in Ultrasound Tongue Imaging Using a Headset to Permit Natural Head Movement , 2008 .

[22]  Gérard Chollet,et al.  Acquisition of Ultrasound, Video and Acoustic Speech Data for a Silent-Speech Interface Application , 2008 .

[23]  Khalil Iskarous,et al.  Tongue-Jaw Synergy in Vowel Height Production: Evidence from American English , 2008 .

[24]  Ian Wilson ARTICULATORY SETTINGS OF FRENCH AND ENGLISH MONOLINGUAL AND BILINGUAL SPEAKERS , 2006 .

[25]  L. Raphael,et al.  Cross-sectional tongue shape and linguopalatal contact patterns in [s], [∫], [f], and [1] , 1992 .

[26]  Bryan Gick,et al.  Techniques for field application of lingual ultrasound imaging , 2005, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[27]  Bonny E. Sands,et al.  Rarefaction gestures and coarticulation in mangetti dune !xung clicks , 2009, INTERSPEECH.

[28]  T D Cradduck,et al.  National electrical manufacturers association , 1983, Journal of the A.I.E.E..

[29]  Peter Ladefoged,et al.  Clicks and their accompaniments , 1994 .