Complexity Levels of Representing Dynamics in EA Planning

Enterprise Architecture (EA) models provide information on the fundamental as-is structure of a company or governmental agency and thus serve as an informational basis for informed decisions in enterprise transformation projects. At the same time EA models provide a means to develop and visualize to-be states in the EA planning process. Results of a literature review and implications from industry practices show that existing EA planning processes do not sufficiently cover dynamic aspects in EA planning. This paper conceptualizes seven levels of complexity for structuring EA planning dynamics by a system of interrelated as-is and to-be models. While level 1 represents the lowest complexity with non-connected as-is and to-be models, level 7 covers a multi-period planning process also taking plan deviations during transformation phases into account. Based on these complexity levels, a multi-stage evolution of EA planning processes is proposed which develops non-dynamic as-is EA modeling into full-scale EA planning.

[1]  Stephan Murer,et al.  Managed Evolution Nachhaltige Weiterentwicklung großer Systeme , 2008 .

[2]  Farhad Arbab,et al.  Enterprise architecture: Management tool and blueprint for the organisation , 2006, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[3]  Florian Matthes,et al.  An Information Model for Landscape Management - Discussing Temporality Aspects , 2008, ICSOC Workshops.

[4]  Christian M. Schweda,et al.  Using Metrics to Evaluate Failure Propagation and Failure Impacts in Application Landscapes , 2008, Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[5]  Ulrich Frank,et al.  Multi-perspective enterprise modeling (MEMO) conceptual framework and modeling languages , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Robert Winter,et al.  Analysis and Application Scenarios of Enterprise Architecture: An Exploratory Study , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW'06).

[7]  Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems , 1999 .

[8]  Mirja Pulkkinen,et al.  Systemic Management of Architectural Decisions in Enterprise Architecture Planning. Four Dimensions and Three Abstraction Levels , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[9]  Jan L. G. Dietz,et al.  Enterprise ontology - theory and methodology , 2006 .

[10]  Eetu I. Niemi,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Stakeholders - a Holistic View , 2007, AMCIS.

[11]  Marc M. Lankhorst Enterprise Architecture at Work - Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 3rd Edition , 2005, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[12]  Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Concepts for Modelling Enterprise Architectures , 2003 .

[13]  Andrew Targowski,et al.  The architecture and planning of enterprise-wide information management systems , 1989 .

[14]  Mirja Pulkkinen,et al.  A Practical Approach to EA Planning and Development: the EA Management Grid , 2004 .

[15]  Henk Jonkers,et al.  Concepts For Modeling Enterprise Architectures , 2004, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[16]  William R. King,et al.  Strategic Planning for Management Information Systems , 1978, MIS Q..

[17]  Florian Matthes,et al.  Current and Future Tool Support for EA Management , 2008 .

[18]  Mirja Pulkkinen,et al.  EA Planning, Development and Management Process for Agile Enterprise Development , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Martin Op't Land,et al.  Enterprise Architecture - Creating Value by Informed Governance , 2008, The Enterprise Engineering Series.

[20]  Robert Winter,et al.  Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW'06).

[21]  Michael Tiemann,et al.  UPDATING THE ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING MODEL , 2006 .

[22]  Tanja Ylimäki,et al.  POTENTIAL CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE , 2008 .

[23]  Michael Rohloff,et al.  Framework and Reference for Architecture Design , 2008, AMCIS.

[24]  Brian J. Lindgren,et al.  Information Systems Strategic Planning , 1993 .

[25]  IEEE-SA Standards Board , 2000 .

[26]  Florian Matthes,et al.  Evaluating Failure Propagation in the Application Landscape of a Large Bank , 2008 .