Wireless indoor positioning: Effective deployment of cells and auto-calibration

Establishing a precise location for wireless users while they are indoors is currently an important challenge. The triangulation techniques used for external locations are useless due to adverse effects like the lack of line-of-sight or to multipath propagation. Fingerprinting methods, which are based on the comparison of received signal strength (RSS) values measured by the mobile phone with a radiomap of RSS values recorded during the calibration phase, currently offer the best methods for indoor scenarios. However, they are also affected by problems like channel variability. In this paper, we propose two ways to improve the systems based on fingerprinting methods. The first method minimizes negative effects resulting from inadequate deployment of the radio frequency emitters and describes a method to determine the minimum number and the best way to locate them from initial layout and accuracy requirements. The second method increases accuracy thanks to an automatic radiomap recalibration technique that leverages the measurements reported by a small number of static reference points, strategically deployed in an indoors environment.

[1]  Alfonso Fernández-Durán,et al.  Automatic planning tool for deployment of indoor wireless local area networks , 2009, IWCMC.

[2]  Lihua Xie,et al.  Secure and robust Wi-Fi fingerprinting indoor localization , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation.

[3]  Chutima Prommak,et al.  On the Impact of Reference Node Placement in Wireless Indoor Positioning Systems , 2011 .

[4]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  Location Systems for Ubiquitous Computing , 2001, Computer.

[5]  Jing Liu,et al.  Survey of Wireless Indoor Positioning Techniques and Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[6]  Alfonso Fernández-Durán,et al.  UMTS femtocell performance in massive deployments: Capacity and GoS implications , 2009, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[7]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Adaptive Temporal Radio Maps for Indoor Location Estimation , 2005, Third IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.

[8]  Mauro Brunato,et al.  Statistical learning theory for location fingerprinting in wireless LANs , 2005, Comput. Networks.

[9]  Pawel Gburzynski,et al.  On the Impact of Node Placement and Profile Point Selection on Indoor Localization , 2009, WMNC/PWC.

[10]  Luís Felipe M. de Moraes,et al.  Calibration-free WLAN location system based on dynamic mapping of signal strength , 2006, MobiWac '06.

[11]  Lin Ma,et al.  Dynamic Radio Map Construction for WLAN Indoor Location , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics.

[12]  Tsung-Nan Lin,et al.  Performance comparison of indoor positioning techniques based on location fingerprinting in wireless networks , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing.

[13]  Simone Frattasi,et al.  Mobile Positioning and Tracking: From Conventional to Cooperative Techniques , 2010 .

[14]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[15]  Raquel Perez Leal,et al.  A Method to Estimate the Horizontal Handover Decision Effect on Indoor Wireless Conversational Video Quality , 2008, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..