Associative retrieval processes in free recall

I present a new method for analyzing associative processes in free recall. While previous research has emphasized the prominence of semantic organization, the present method illustrates the importance of association by contiguity. This is done by examining conditional response probabilities in the output sequence. For a given item recalled, I examine the probability and latency that it follows an item from a nearby or distant input position. These conditional probabilities and latencies, plotted as a function of the lag between studied items, reveal several regularities about output order in free recall. First, subjects tend to recall items more often and more rapidly from adjacent input positions than from remote input positions. Second, subjects are about twice as likely to recall adjacent pairs in the forward than in the backward direction and are significantly faster in doing so. These effects are observed at all positions in the output sequence. The asymmetry effect is theoretically significant because, in cued recall, nearly symmetric retrieval is found at all serial positions (Kahana, 1995; Murdock, 1962). An attempt is made to fit the search of associative memory model (Raaijmakers & Shiffrin, 1980, 1981) with and without symmetric interitem associations to these data. Other models of free recall are also discussed.

[1]  J. Deese,et al.  Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  S. Ebenholtz,et al.  The Process of Free Recall: Evidence for Non-Associative Factors in Acquisition and Retention , 1962 .

[3]  Murdock,et al.  The serial position effect of free recall , 1962 .

[4]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[5]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Two storage mechanisms in free recall , 1966 .

[6]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Effects of list length on short-term memory , 1967 .

[7]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[8]  T. Shuell Clustering and organization in free recall. , 1969 .

[9]  R. Okada,et al.  Interresponse times in single-trial free recall. , 1970 .

[10]  B. Murdock,et al.  The effects of visual presentation method on single-trial free recall , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[11]  E. R. Harcum,et al.  Serial learning and paralearning , 1975 .

[12]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Controlled rehearsal in single-trial free recall , 1978 .

[13]  Richard M. Shiffrin,et al.  SAM: A theory of probabilistic search in associative memory. , 1980 .

[14]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Search of associative memory. , 1981 .

[15]  Janet Metcalfe,et al.  An encoding and retrieval model of single-trial free recall , 1981 .

[16]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[17]  A. Glenberg,et al.  A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Recall and Measures of Memory Organization , 1986 .

[19]  M. Gardner,et al.  USING CONFIDENCE INTERVALS , 1987, The Lancet.

[20]  Sam C. Brown,et al.  Clustering and recall : do high clusterers recall more than low clusterers because of clustering ? , 1991 .

[21]  J. S. Nairne,et al.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  W. Batchelder,et al.  Predicting Clustering From Semantic Structure , 1993 .

[23]  J. Wixted,et al.  An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[24]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.