Dynamics of aggregation in Lasius niger (Formicidae): influence of polyethism

SummaryPolyethism is a well-known phenomenon in social insects. How this phenomenon influences interactions among individuals, the spatial distribution in the nest is, on the other hand, very rarely documented. Therefore, we conducted experiments on the ant Lasius niger to observe the influence of polyethism on aggregation, by distinguishing two groups of ants: the brood-tenders and the foragers. We show a great difference in their self aggregation level. Brood-tenders are characterized by a rapid and dense gathering in one main stable cluster while foragers gather in several small unstable clusters. We show experimentally and verify with a model that this difference in behaviour is based on a smaller probability of leaving a cluster for the brood-tenders. Aggregation in the mixed case (groups composed of brood-tenders and foragers) is very close to that of the pure forager case, showing a decrease in the level of aggregation of the brood-tenders respecting to the pure group of brood-tenders. Nevertheless, experimental results supported by the results of the model, show that ants do not change their own behaviour when the two groups are together. Therefore, the decrease of the aggregation of brood-tenders in the mixed case can be explained by a difference in the dynamics between brood-tenders and foragers.

[1]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the antLasius niger (L.) , 1992, Insectes Sociaux.

[2]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta) , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  S. Vinson,et al.  Behavioral flexibility of temporal subcastes in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, in response to food , 1984 .

[4]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Polyéthisme et Répartition des Niveaux d'Activité chez la Fourmi Lasius niger L. , 1983 .

[5]  Iain D. Couzin,et al.  Coupled oscillators and activity waves in ant colonies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  J. Murray,et al.  A mathematical model of self-organized pattern formation on the combs of honeybee colonies , 1990 .

[7]  Robin J Stuart,et al.  Genetic component to division of labor among workers of a leptothoracine ant , 1991, Naturwissenschaften.

[8]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  How does colony growth influence communication in ants? , 2003, Insectes Sociaux.

[9]  C. Detrain,et al.  Collective exploration and area marking in the ant Lasius niger , 2002, Insectes Sociaux.

[10]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: Experimental) , 1993 .

[11]  Dominique Fresneau,et al.  Individuality and colonial identity in ants: the emergence of the social representation concept , 1999 .

[12]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[13]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  How food type and brood influence foraging decisions of Lasius niger scouts , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  John G. Robinson.  On the Move. How and Why Animals Travel in Groups , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  D. Gordon,et al.  Task-Related Environment Alters the Cuticular Hydrocarbon Composition of Harvester Ants , 2001, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[16]  N. Franks,et al.  Brood sorting by ants: distributing the workload over the work-surface , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  R. R. Krausz.  Living in Groups , 2013 .

[18]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized defensive behavior in honeybees. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  E. Wilson,et al.  Division of labor in fire ants based on physical castes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Solenopsis). , 1978 .

[20]  L. Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Complexity, pattern, and evolutionary trade-offs in animal aggregation. , 1999, Science.

[21]  J. Fewell,et al.  Models of division of labor in social insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[22]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius: distribution of workers, brood and seeds within the nest in relation to colony size and season , 1999 .

[23]  NIGEL R FRANKS,et al.  Self-organizing nest construction in ants: individual worker behaviour and the nest's dynamics , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  L. Passera,et al.  Les sociétés animales: évolution de la coopération et organisation sociale , 2000 .

[25]  N. Franks,et al.  Spatial relationships within nests of the ant Leptothorax unifasciatus (Latr.) and their implications for the division of labour , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (A study of temporal polyethism: Experimental) , 1993 .

[27]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species , 1976, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[28]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions , 2003, Nature.

[29]  N. Franks,et al.  Social resilience in individual worker ants and its role in division of labour , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta) , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  W. H. Whitcomb,et al.  Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. , 1970 .

[32]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized asymmetries in ant foraging: A functional response to food type and colony needs , 2002 .

[33]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Task-Related Differences in the Cuticular Hydrocarbon Composition of Harvester Ants, Pogonomyrmex barbatus , 1998, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[34]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies. II: Learning in foraging and division of labor , 1987 .

[35]  Christoph Kleineidam,et al.  Collective control of nest climate parameters in bumblebee colonies , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  R. H. Wiley.  Lekking in Birds and Mammals: Behavioral and Evolutionary Issues , 1991 .

[37]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Modulation of trail laying in the antLasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source , 1993, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[38]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Harvester Ants Utilize Cuticular Hydrocarbons in Nestmate Recognition , 2000, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[39]  R. Ceusters.  Social homeostasis in colonies of Formica polyctena Foerst. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): nestform and temperature preferences , 1977 .

[40]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Testing the limits of social resilience in ant colonies , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[41]  A. Magurran,et al.  The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predator defense in fish , 1990 .

[42]  R. Crozier,et al.  Genetic influence on caste in the ant Camponotus consobrinus , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  L. Stapley.  Physical worker castes in colonies of an acacia-ant (Crematogaster nigriceps) correlated with an intra-colonial division of defensive behaviour , 1999, Insectes Sociaux.