Gender Affirmation Surgery From a Public Health Perspective: Advances, Challenges, and Areas of Opportunity.

Gender affirmation surgery (GAS) is sought out by approximately 20 to 40% of transgender individuals. These patients possess unique mental and physical health needs. These are compounded by prejudices and lack of education about transgender individuals within the medical system and society at large. Societal and medical barriers are associated with increased risks of violence, suicide, and sexually transmitted infections. This combination of high medical needs and barriers to accessing appropriate care may give rise to a self-perpetuating cycle of risk exposure, stigmatization, prejudice, and eventually poor health outcomes. It is imperative that plastic and reconstructive surgeons understand GAS from a public health perspective, so that they may provide the highest quality of care and help alleviate these disparities. The authors describe unique public health topics in GAS. These are specifically related to healthcare access, surgical education, cultural sensitivity, as well as mental health outcomes for patients who undergo GAS.

[1]  Eric D Plemons,et al.  A Capable Surgeon and a Willing Electrologist: Challenges to the Expansion of Transgender Surgical Care in the United States. , 2019, Medical anthropology quarterly.

[2]  John T. Stranix,et al.  Assessing Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Masculinizing Top Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Descriptive Survey Study , 2019, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  M. Bergren,et al.  Enhancing Cultural Sensitivity in a Community Health Care Setting for LGBTQ Patients , 2018, Journal of community health nursing.

[4]  Lisa M. Kodadek,et al.  Temporal Trends in Gender-Affirming Surgery Among Transgender Patients in the United States , 2018, JAMA surgery.

[5]  S. Vujović,et al.  Gender Dysphoria: Bioethical Aspects of Medical Treatment , 2018, BioMed research international.

[6]  C. Salgado,et al.  Is There Value to Seeing a Transgender Fellowship-Trained Surgeon? , 2018, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  C. Henning‐Smith,et al.  Barriers to Care Among Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Adults , 2017, The Milbank quarterly.

[8]  S. Reisner,et al.  Factors Associated with Gender-Affirming Surgery and Age of Hormone Therapy Initiation Among Transgender Adults , 2017, Transgender health.

[9]  L. Schechter Response to Letter to the Editor: "Gender Confirmation Surgery: Guiding Principles". , 2017, Journal of Sexual Medicine.

[10]  K. Claes,et al.  Gender Confirmation Surgery: Guiding Principles. , 2017, The journal of sexual medicine.

[11]  L. Kovacs,et al.  Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction Following Male-to-Female Sex Reassignment Surgery. , 2017, The journal of sexual medicine.

[12]  Stelios C. Wilson,et al.  Are We Adequately Preparing Our Trainees to Care for Transgender Patients? , 2017, Journal of graduate medical education.

[13]  M. Barone,et al.  A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Transsexual Surgery , 2017, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[14]  L. Schechter,et al.  Gender Confirmation Surgery: A New Frontier in Plastic Surgery Education. , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[15]  R. Horton,et al.  Transgender health: an opportunity for global health equity , 2016, The Lancet.

[16]  Maya Bulman,et al.  Cultural Sensitivity and Challenges in Management of the Transgender Patient With ESRD in Transplantation , 2016, Progress in transplantation.

[17]  J. R. Green,et al.  Transsexual Surgery Follow-Up: Status in the 1990s , 2012 .

[18]  S. Monstrey,et al.  Quality of life and sexual health after sex reassignment surgery in transsexual men. , 2011, The journal of sexual medicine.

[19]  J. Spiegel,et al.  Quality of life of individuals with and without facial feminization surgery or gender reassignment surgery , 2010, Quality of Life Research.