Cheating and Moral Judgment in the College Classroom: A Natural Experiment

The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a natural experiment involving academic cheating by university students. We explore the relationship of moral judgment (as measured using the defining issues test) to actual behavior, as well as the relationship between the honesty of students self-reports and the extent of cheating. We were able to determine the extent to which students actually cheated on the take-home portion of an accounting exam. The take-home problem was not assigned with the intent of inducing cheating among students. However, the high rate of observed cheating prompted the instructor to return to class and ask the students to provide information on their motivation. The students' responses are the data analyzed in this natural experiment. We found that in a simple regression the relationship between moral judgment scores and cheating behavior was insignificant. However, when we tested whether including Utilizer scores (i.e. the extent to which people select actions based on notions of justice) affected the relationship of cheating and moral judgment we found that Utilizer affected the relationship significantly. Finally, we found that moral judgment and honesty were not related, but higher levels of cheating behavior related to less honesty.

[1]  Renate R. Mai-Dalton.  The experiences of one faculty member in a business ethics seminar: What can we take back to the classroom? , 1987 .

[2]  Einar Marnburg,et al.  The Questionable Use of Moral Development Theory in Studies of Business Ethics: Discussion and Empirical Findings , 2001 .

[3]  Clifford Nowell,et al.  Undergraduate Student Cheating in the Fields of Business and Economics , 1997 .

[4]  Marvin Karlins,et al.  An empirical investigation of actual cheating in a large sample of undergraduates , 1988 .

[5]  Can Ethics Be Taught , 1993 .

[6]  M. Davison,et al.  Describing and testing a moderator of the moral judgment and action relationship. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  J. Darley,et al.  “I Am Moral, But You Are Deterred”: Differential Attributions About Why People Obey the Law1 , 2002 .

[8]  C. Mitchell Dayton,et al.  Improved estimation of academic cheating behavior using the randomized response technique , 1987 .

[9]  R. Greenberg,et al.  The Relationship of the DIT and Behavior: A Replication , 2001 .

[10]  W. Gardner,et al.  Analysis of Cheating on Academic Assignments , 1988 .

[11]  S. Newstead,et al.  Individual differences in student cheating. , 1996 .

[12]  D. Crown,et al.  Learning from the Literature on Collegiate Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research , 1998 .

[13]  Gregory J. Cizek,et al.  Cheating on Tests : How To Do It, Detect It, and Prevent It , 1999 .

[14]  Carolyn A. Strand,et al.  Survey Results of the Ethical Beliefs of Business Students , 2000 .

[15]  Carl Malinowski,et al.  Moral reasoning and moral conduct: An investigation prompted by Kohlberg's theory. , 1985 .

[16]  Lawrence A. Ponemon.  Can ethics be taught in accounting , 1993 .

[17]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  Postconventional Moral Thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian Approach , 1999 .

[18]  Kenneth J. Smith,et al.  A structural modeling investigation of the influence of demographic and attitudinal factors and in-class deterrents on cheating behavior among accounting majors , 2002 .

[19]  M. Bebeau,et al.  The Defining Issues Test and the Four Component Model: Contributions to professional education , 2002, Journal of moral education.

[20]  Cathy Owens Swift,et al.  Deterring Cheating Behavior in the Marketing Classroom: An Analysis of the Effects of Demographics, Attitudes, and In-Class Deterrent Strategies , 1998 .

[21]  Marcia P. Miceli,et al.  Blowing the Whistle on Data Fudging: A Controlled Field Experiment1 , 1991 .

[22]  Donald L. Mccabe,et al.  Academic Dishonesty among Males in College: A Thirty Year Perspective. , 1994 .

[23]  Randi L. Sims,et al.  The Relationship Between Academic Dishonesty and Unethical Business Practices , 1993 .

[24]  R. Robbins,et al.  A Thirty-Year Perspective , 2001 .

[25]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  The Influence of Collegiate and Corporate Codes of Conduct on Ethics-Related Behavior in the Workplace , 1996, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[26]  George E. Stevens,et al.  Ethical Inclinations of Tomorrow's Managers Revisited: How and Why Students Cheat. , 1987 .