Masses in mammography: what are the underlying anatomopathological lesions?

The semiological description of masses in mammography is based on the BI-RADS system provided by the American College of Radiology. The contour is the most discriminating morphological criterion between benign and malignant masses. Most circumscribed masses are benign. Nevertheless, due to specific histological characteristics, certain malignant lesions or lesions with a risk of malignancy may appear in the mammography in this falsely reassuring form. An indistinct contour in the mammography is suspicious and requires a tissue sample. The positive predictive value of malignancy varies according to the morphology of the contour. It is lower for microlobulated contours, increases for masked, then indistinct contours and reaches 96% for spiculated contours. However, in rare cases, certain benign lesions may appear in the form of spiculated masses. In these specific cases, a correlation between the histological results with the imaging data is essential in order to avoid failing to recognise an underlying malignant lesion that the biopsy may have underestimated.

[1]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  W H Gordenne,et al.  Mach bands in mammography. , 1988, Radiology.

[3]  G. W. Eklund,et al.  Mammographic halo sign revisited. , 1996, Radiology.

[4]  M. Helvie,et al.  Pure and mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast: pathologic basis for differences in mammographic appearance. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  B. Fornage,et al.  Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic features. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  L. Liberman,et al.  Benign and malignant phyllodes tumors: mammographic and sonographic findings. , 1996, Radiology.

[7]  I. Ellis,et al.  The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[8]  L. Liberman,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[9]  L. Liberman,et al.  The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  G. Contesso,et al.  Évaluation comparée des mesures cliniques, radiologiques et anatomiques des tumeurs mammaires , 1971 .

[11]  KM Harris,et al.  Infiltrating lobular carcinoma: mammographic patterns with pathologic correlation. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  C. Wells,et al.  Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[13]  J. Kristek,et al.  Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast – Diagnostic and Therapeutic Dilemmas , 2007, Oncology Research and Treatment.

[14]  V. Bécette,et al.  Stellate images: anatomic and radiologic correlations. , 2005, European journal of radiology.