Quantitative risk analysis - Ship security analysis for effective risk control options

This study reviews ship security assessment. The objectives are to explore the possibilities for quantifying and performing a more thorough ship security risk analysis than that described in the International Ship and Port Facility Security code and to evaluate to what extent this more detailed analysis increases ship security and facilitate the effective selection of risk control options. The study focuses on Somali-based maritime piracy, using piracy on the Indian Ocean as a case study. Data are collected using questionnaires and interviews with civilian and military security experts who possess firsthand experience of piracy off the coast of Somalia. The data are collected specifically for this study and describe and quantify the threat’s capability, intent and likelihood of exploiting a ship’s vulnerability. Based on the collected description of the threat, the study analyzes and describes: probability of detection by pirates, probability of successful approach, and probability of successful boarding. The performed work shows good agreement between calculated probabilities and frequencies in the cited incident reports. Also, the developed scenarios describe the most important influences on the analyzed areas. The research therefore shows that the proposed risk-based approach, which uses structurally collected and documented information on the threat, can increase ship security by assisting in selecting risk control options. The approach also allows for a better understanding of the causal relationship between threat and risk than that provided in today’s security analysis by ship owners, for example. This understanding is crucial to choosing effective and robust risk control options.

[1]  John Andrews,et al.  Reliability and Risk Assessment , 1994 .

[2]  Mattias Wengelin,et al.  Service, Regulations, and Ports: An Actor-Network perspective on the social dimension of Service-Dominant Logic , 2012 .

[3]  Efthimios E. Mitropoulos IMO: Rising to new challenges , 2004 .

[4]  Karl Sörenson,et al.  Wrong Hands on Deck? : Combatting Piracy and Building Maritime Security in Eastern Africa , 2011 .

[5]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  THE FALSE PROMISES OF RISK ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[6]  Ross D. Shachter Probabilistic Inference and Influence Diagrams , 1988, Oper. Res..

[7]  James Kraska,et al.  Freakonomics of Maritime Piracy , 2010 .

[8]  P. Terndrup Pedersen Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures , 2010 .

[9]  Jeppe Skovbakke Juhl Risk-Based Approval , 2009 .

[10]  James Kraska,et al.  Fighting Pirates: The Pen and the Sword , 2008 .

[11]  Li Xian-qiang,et al.  Analysis of Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships Annual Report 2007 , 2008 .

[12]  Maria Grazia Starita,et al.  The Regulatory Framework , 2012 .

[13]  Yi-Chih Yang Risk management of Taiwan’s maritime supply chain security , 2011 .

[14]  Preben Terndrup Pedersen,et al.  Bayesian Networks as a Decision Support Tool in Marine Applications , 2001 .

[15]  詳子 斎藤,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking の拡張とその応用 , 2003 .

[16]  Dracos Vassalos,et al.  Risk-Based Ship Design , 2009 .

[17]  Peter Chalk,et al.  Piracy Off the Horn of Africa: Scope, Dimensions, Causes and Responses , 2010 .

[18]  Robert Beckman,et al.  Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships , 2014 .

[19]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Risk Analysis and Risk Management in an Uncertain World 1 , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.