Model-based estimation of quantitative ultrasound variables at the proximal femur

To improve the prediction of the osteoporotic fracture risk at the proximal femur we are developing a scanner for quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements at this site. Due to multipath transmission in this complex shaped bone, conventional signal processing techniques developed for QUS measurements at peripheral sites frequently fail. Therefore, we propose a model-based estimation of the QUS variables and analyze the performance of the new algorithm. Applying the proposed method to QUS scans of excised proximal femurs increased the fraction of evaluable signals from approx. 60% (using conventional algorithms) to 97%. The correlation of the standard QUS variables broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) with the established variable bone mineral density (BMD) reported in previous studies is maintained (BUA/BMD: r2 = 0.69; SOS/BMD: r2= 0.71; SOS+BUA/BMD: r2 = 0.88). Additionally, different wave types could be clearly detected and characterized in the trochanteric region. The ability to separate superimposed signals with this approach opens up further diagnostic potential for evaluating waves of different sound paths and wave types through bone tissue.

[1]  G Van der Perre,et al.  A comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to ultrasonic velocity measurement in trabecular bone. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Michael C. Nevitt,et al.  Mortality Following Fractures in Older Women: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures , 1996 .

[3]  M. Kaczmarek,et al.  Short ultrasonic waves in cancellous bone. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[4]  W. Lauriks,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cancellous bone: application of Biot theory. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Ilan Ziskind,et al.  Maximum likelihood localization of multiple sources by alternating projection , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[6]  A. Hosokawa,et al.  Ultrasonic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Timothy G Leighton,et al.  Estimation of critical and viscous frequencies for Biot theory in cancellous bone. , 2003, Ultrasonics.

[8]  N Loveridge,et al.  Structure of the Femoral Neck in Hip Fracture: Cortical Bone Loss in the Inferoanterior to Superoposterior Axis , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  P. Laugier,et al.  Ultrasound images of the os calcis: a new method of assessment of bone status , 1993 .

[10]  P R White,et al.  Ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone: a new stratified model. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus Reflects the Mechanical Properties of Calcaneal Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  J. Currey.  Bone Strength: What are We Trying to Measure? , 2001, Calcified Tissue International.

[13]  J. Saniie,et al.  Model-based estimation of ultrasonic echoes. Part I: Analysis and algorithms , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[14]  E. Bossy,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of ultrasound propagation through trabecular bone structures measured by synchrotron microtomography , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  C-C Glüer,et al.  In vitro speed of sound measurement at intact human femur specimens. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  F. Padilla,et al.  In Vitro Ultrasound Measurement at the Human Femur , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[17]  M. Biot.  Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid‐Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low‐Frequency Range , 1956 .

[18]  Reinhard Barkmann,et al.  Association of Five Quantitative Ultrasound Devices and Bone Densitometry With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Population‐Based Sample: The OPUS Study , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  P. Laugier,et al.  Velocity dispersion of acoustic waves in cancellous bone , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  S. Cummings,et al.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures , 2002, The Lancet.

[21]  H. K. Genant,et al.  Is Quantitative Ultrasound Dependent on Bone Structure? A Reflection , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  C M Langton,et al.  A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone. , 1990, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[23]  F. Padilla,et al.  Optimal Prediction of Bone Mineral Density with Ultrasonic Measurements in Excised Human Femur , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[24]  F. Padilla,et al.  Effects of frequency-dependent attenuation and velocity dispersion on in vitro ultrasound velocity measurements in intact human femur specimens , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  P. Laugier,et al.  A method for the estimation of femoral bone mineral density from variables of ultrasound transmission through the human femur. , 2007, Bone.

[26]  P. Laugier,et al.  2A-6 Optimization Algorithm for Improved Quantitative Ultrasound Signal Processing at the Proximal Femur , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[27]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  Kay Dickersin,et al.  Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. , 2000, NIH consensus statement.

[29]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound: Assessment of Osteoporosis and Bone Status , 1999 .

[30]  M. Parker,et al.  Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. , 1993, BMJ.

[31]  O. Johnell,et al.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures , 1996 .

[32]  Methoden der in vivo-Ultraschallmeßtechnik am Skelett: Grundlagen und technische Realisierung , 1999 .

[33]  Susan R. Johnson,et al.  Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. , 2001, JAMA.

[34]  L. Le.  An investigation of pulse-timing techniques for broadband ultrasonic velocity determination in cancellous bone: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  G Van der Perre,et al.  Structural and material mechanical properties of human vertebral cancellous bone. , 1997, Medical engineering & physics.

[36]  J. Zagzebski,et al.  Comparison of speed of sound and ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis to bone density of the radius, femur and lumbar spine. , 1989, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[37]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? , 1998, Bone.

[38]  A. J. Clarke,et al.  The measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in fixed trabecular bone using broadband pulses and single-frequency tone bursts. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  R. Kuc,et al.  Parametric Estimation of the Acoustic Attenuation Coefficient Slope for Soft Tissue , 1976 .

[40]  P. Laugier,et al.  Phase and group velocities of fast and slow compressional waves in trabecular bone. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.