Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity after lung resection in patients without obstructive lung disease.

BACKGROUND Diffusing capacity (DLCO), an independent predictor of morbidity after major lung resection, is not used routinely in preoperative evaluation because of a perceived lack of value in patients with normal spirometry. We evaluated the potential utility of measuring DLCO for assessment of operative risk in lung resection patients with normal spirometry. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted for patients undergoing lung resection from 1980 through 2006 to identify predictors of postoperative morbidity. Patients were divided into groups with or without chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), defined as a ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity of less than 0.7 or a ratio of 0.7 or greater, respectively. Analyses for each group identified covariates for three outcomes: operative mortality, pulmonary morbidity, and overall morbidity. RESULTS Of 1,046 patients in the database, 1,008 (545 men; mean age, 61.8 +/- 0.35 years) had data permitting determination of COPD status: 450 (45%) with COPD, 558 (55%) without COPD. Operations included lobectomy (752; 75%), bilobectomy (83; 8%), and pneumonectomy (173; 17%). Overall mortality, pulmonary morbidity, and overall morbidity incidences were 59 (5.8%), 140 (14.0%), and 311 (31.4%), respectively. Pulmonary morbidity and operative mortality were related to postoperative predicted DLCO, age, and performance status in patients with and without COPD. The postoperative predicted DLCO was the single strongest predictor of pulmonary morbidity and operative mortality in both patient groups. Overall complications were related to postoperative predicted DLCO only in the COPD group. CONCLUSIONS Diffusing capacity is an important predictor of postoperative morbidity after lung resection even in patients with normal spirometry. Routine measurement of DLCO, regardless of spirometric findings, can help predict risk in candidates for major lung resection.

[1]  R. Mick,et al.  Optimizing selection of patients for major lung resection. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  G. Colice,et al.  The physiologic evaluation of patients with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery. , 2003, Chest.

[3]  D. Hillman,et al.  Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. , 1989, The American review of respiratory disease.

[4]  H. Rasmussen,et al.  Pulmonary diffusion capacity studies. II. Clinical results using a modified carbon monoxide breathholding technique. , 1958, American Journal of the Medical Sciences.

[5]  Martin Utley,et al.  The European Thoracic Surgery Database project: modelling the risk of in-hospital death following lung resection. , 2005, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  G. Glonek,et al.  Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity and mortality after pulmonary resection. , 1988, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  W. Vigneswaran,et al.  Changes in patient presentation and outcomes for major lung resection over three decades. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[8]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[9]  R. Pauwels,et al.  Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[10]  John P Griffin,et al.  Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). , 2007, Chest.

[11]  V. Seshan,et al.  Incidence and risk factors for lung injury after lung cancer resection. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  D. Bates,et al.  Respiratory function in emphysema in relation to prognosis. , 1956, The Quarterly journal of medicine.

[13]  B. Burrows,et al.  The effects of thoracic surgery on the pulmonary diffusing capacity. , 1960, The American review of respiratory disease.

[14]  M. Mcilroy,et al.  Respiratory Function after Pneumonectomy , 1956, Thorax.

[15]  B. Burrows,et al.  The postpneumonectomy state: clinical and physiologic observations in thirty-six cases. , 1960, The American journal of medicine.

[16]  Kemp Kernstine,et al.  Preoperative Exercise Vo2 Measurement for Lung Resection Candidates: Results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9238 , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[17]  D. M. Billig,et al.  Clinical, physiologic, and morphologic examination of the lung in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma and the relation of the findings to postoperative deaths. , 1970, The American review of respiratory disease.

[18]  G. Rocco,et al.  Carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity improves risk stratification in patients without airflow limitation: evidence for systematic measurement before lung resection. , 2006, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[19]  E. Dmitrovsky,et al.  Lung cancer prevention: the guidelines. , 2003, Chest.

[20]  R. Pierce,et al.  Preoperative risk evaluation for lung cancer resection: predicted postoperative product as a predictor of surgical mortality. , 1994, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.