Lateral cephalometric analysis for treatment planning in orthodontics based on MRI compared with radiographs: A feasibility study in children and adolescents

Objective The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is equivalent to lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCR, “gold standard”) in cephalometric analysis. Methods The applied MRI technique was optimized for short scanning time, high resolution, high contrast and geometric accuracy. Prior to orthodontic treatment, 20 patients (mean age ± SD, 13.95 years ± 5.34) received MRI and LCR. MRI datasets were postprocessed into lateral cephalograms. Cephalometric analysis was performed twice by two independent observers for both modalities with an interval of 4 weeks. Eight bilateral and 10 midsagittal landmarks were identified, and 24 widely used measurements (14 angles, 10 distances) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed by using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis and two one-sided tests (TOST) within the predefined equivalence margin of ± 2°/mm. Results Geometric accuracy of the MRI technique was confirmed by phantom measurements. Mean intraobserver ICC were 0.977/0.975 for MRI and 0.975/0.961 for LCR. Average interobserver ICC were 0.980 for MRI and 0.929 for LCR. Bland-Altman analysis showed high levels of agreement between the two modalities, bias range (mean ± SD) was -0.66 to 0.61 mm (0.06 ± 0.44) for distances and -1.33 to 1.14° (0.06 ± 0.71) for angles. Except for the interincisal angle (p = 0.17) all measurements were statistically equivalent (p < 0.05). Conclusions This study demonstrates feasibility of orthodontic treatment planning without radiation exposure based on MRI. High-resolution isotropic MRI datasets can be transformed into lateral cephalograms allowing reliable measurements as applied in orthodontic routine with high concordance to the corresponding measurements on LCR.

[1]  Soyeon Ahn,et al.  How to demonstrate similarity by using noninferiority and equivalence statistical testing in radiology research. , 2013, Radiology.

[2]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[3]  S Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.

[4]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Dental MRI using wireless intraoral coils , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[5]  A E Stabrun,et al.  Precision in cephalometric landmark identification. , 1982, European journal of orthodontics.

[6]  R. Nalçaci,et al.  A comparison of two-dimensional radiography and three-dimensional computed tomography in angular cephalometric measurements. , 2010, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[7]  D L Gander,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics , 2002 .

[8]  Donald J. Schuirmann A comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability , 1987, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[9]  Kazunori Yoshiura,et al.  The accuracy of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance 3D vibe images of the mandible: an in vitro comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[10]  Maritzabel Gubler,et al.  PRECISION OF CEPHALOMETRIC LANDMARK IDENTIFICATION , 2008 .

[11]  C. Karlo,et al.  Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements. , 2015, European journal of orthodontics.

[12]  Sheldon Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements , 1971 .

[13]  Timothy J Jorgensen,et al.  Dental x‐rays and risk of meningioma , 2013, Cancer.

[14]  Cecil C. Steiner,et al.  Cephalometrics In Clinical Practice , 2009 .

[15]  B. Holly Broadbent,et al.  A NEW X-RAY TECHNIQUE and ITS APPLICATION TO ORTHODONTIA , 2009 .

[16]  André Mol,et al.  In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[17]  R Jacobs,et al.  Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: a systematic review. , 2014, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[18]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[19]  S Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements. 2. Conventional angular and linear measures. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.

[20]  Jens Fiehler,et al.  Optimized 14 + 1 receive coil array and position system for 3D high-resolution MRI of dental and maxillomandibular structures. , 2016, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[21]  J Mühling,et al.  Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography. , 2008, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[22]  Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[23]  F. Bookstein,et al.  The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[24]  S. Heiland,et al.  MR-Imaging of teeth and periodontal apparatus: an experimental study comparing high-resolution MRI with MDCT and CBCT , 2011, European Radiology.

[25]  Amy Berrington de González,et al.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries , 2004, The Lancet.

[26]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of intraoral hard and soft tissues using an intraoral coil and FLASH sequences , 2016, European Radiology.

[27]  Birte Melsen,et al.  Comparison between conventional and cone-beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[28]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Dental MRI: Imaging of soft and solid components without ionizing radiation , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  Danielle R. Periago,et al.  Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[30]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  A Jacobson The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. , 1975, American journal of orthodontics.

[32]  Martin Bendszus,et al.  Dental MRI using a dedicated RF-coil at 3 Tesla. , 2015, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[33]  U Welander,et al.  The effect of projection errors on cephalometric length measurements. , 1986, European journal of orthodontics.