Analysis of Super Rugby from 2011 to 2015

Abstract Rugby shows proof of evolution within the professional era due to large contributions from technology and improved training. Evidence of evolution can be traced through statistics. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare match activities over five seasons (2011–2015) of Super Rugby matches played, and to investigate performance indicators that allow discrimination between winning and losing teams. Data from 30 matches per season (4 matches from each of the 15 participating teams) were captured and supplied by the Cheetahs Super Rugby Franchise (Bloemfontein, South Africa), using the Verusco TryMaker Pro. Differences in mean rates were found between seasons and between winning and losing teams. Losing teams showed an increase in rucks and mauls, lost more scrums and missed more tackles. Playing time, scrums lost and penalties decreased from 2011 to 2015, while scrums (1.76%), rucks (0.80%), mauls (4.42%) and tackles (1.07%) showed a slight increase. Significant differences were found for line-outs (mean of 3.5% per year; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7–6.5%; p = 0.0156) and tackles missed (5.7%; 95% CI 3.0–8.4%; p = <0.001). The findings agree with previous research, that most changes can be contributed to the physiological improvement of players and the increased emphasis on perfecting set phases.

[1]  Wilbur J Kraak,et al.  Changes on the match profile of the South African Currie Cup tournament during 2007 and 2013 , 2016 .

[2]  K. Quarrie,et al.  The relationship between physical fitness and game behaviours in rugby union players , 2014, European journal of sport science.

[3]  C. James,et al.  Quantification of the Safe Maximal Lift in Functional Capacity Evaluations: Comparison of Muscle Recruitment Using SEMG and Therapist Observation , 2013, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[4]  Cathy Craig,et al.  Prospective information for pass decisional behavior in rugby union. , 2011, Human movement science.

[5]  Dawid Daniel Jacobus Malan,et al.  Match analysis of the 2006 Super 14 Rugby Union tournament , 2010 .

[6]  J. Sampaio,et al.  Rugby Game-Related Statistics that Discriminate Between Winning and Losing Teams in Irb and Super Twelve Close Games. , 2010, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[7]  José M Palao,et al.  Differences in game statistics between winning and losing rugby teams in the six nations tournament. , 2009, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[8]  S. Marshall,et al.  Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  Colin W Fuller,et al.  Contact events in rugby union and their propensity to cause injury , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[10]  K. Quarrie,et al.  Changes in player characteristics and match activities in Bledisloe Cup rugby union from 1972 to 2004 , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[11]  M. van Rooyen,et al.  A comparison of performance indicators between the four South African teams and the winners of the 2005 Super 12 Rugby competition. What separates top from bottom? , 2006 .

[12]  Peter O’Donoghue,et al.  The effect of rule changes on match and ball in play time in rugby union. , 2005 .

[13]  R. Jackson,et al.  Pre-performance routine consistency: temporal analysis of goal kicking in the Rugby Union World Cup , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  Grant Duthie,et al.  Applied Physiology and Game Analysis of Rugby Union , 2003, Sports medicine.