User intent prediction with a scaled conjugate gradient trained artificial neural network for lower limb amputees using a powered prosthesis

Powered lower limb prostheses have the ability to provide greater mobility for amputee patients. Such prostheses often have pre-programmed modes which can allow activities such as climbing stairs and descending ramps, something which many amputees struggle with when using non-powered limbs. Previous literature has shown how pattern classification can allow seamless transitions between modes with a high accuracy and without any user interaction. Although accurate, training and testing each subject with their own dependent data is time consuming. By using subject independent datasets, whereby a unique subject is tested against a pooled dataset of other subjects, we believe subject training time can be reduced while still achieving an accurate classification. We present here an intent recognition system using an artificial neural network (ANN) with a scaled conjugate gradient learning algorithm to classify gait intention with user-dependent and independent datasets for six unilateral lower limb amputees. We compare these results against a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifier. The ANN was found to have significantly lower classification error (P<;0.05) than LDA with all user-dependent step-types, as well as transitional steps for user-independent datasets. Both types of classifiers are capable of making fast decisions; 1.29 and 2.83 ms for the LDA and ANN respectively. These results suggest that ANNs can provide suitable and accurate offline classification in prosthesis gait prediction.

[1]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Nicholas P. Fey,et al.  Intent Recognition in a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis Using Time History Information , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Martin Fodslette Meiller A Scaled Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Fast Supervised Learning , 1993 .

[4]  He Huang,et al.  An Analysis of EMG Electrode Configuration for Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Based Neural Machine Interface , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Kimberly A. Ingraham,et al.  Configuring a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis for Transfemoral Amputees within Five Specific Ambulation Modes , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Metabolics of stair ascent with a powered transfemoral prosthesis , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[7]  John E. Ferguson,et al.  Sensor Based Control of a Bimodal Ankle–Foot Prosthesis With a Smart Phone Interface , 2015 .

[8]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Robotic leg control with EMG decoding in an amputee with nerve transfers. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A Classification Method for User-Independent Intent Recognition for Transfemoral Amputees Using Powered Lower Limb Prostheses , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Kimberly A. Ingraham,et al.  Effect of additional mechanical sensor data on an EMG-based pattern recognition system for a powered leg prosthesis , 2015, 2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[11]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  H.A. Varol,et al.  Preliminary Evaluations of a Self-Contained Anthropomorphic Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[13]  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Kimberly A. Ingraham,et al.  Intuitive control of a powered prosthetic leg during ambulation: a randomized clinical trial. , 2015, JAMA.