Finding Approximate Nash Equilibria of Bimatrix Games via Payoff Queries

We study the deterministic and randomized query complexity of finding approximate equilibria in a k × k bimatrix game. We show that the deterministic query complexity of finding an ϵ-Nash equilibrium when ϵ < ½ is Ω(k2), even in zero-one constant-sum games. In combination with previous results [Fearnley et al. 2013], this provides a complete characterization of the deterministic query complexity of approximate Nash equilibria. We also study randomized querying algorithms. We give a randomized algorithm for finding a (3-√5/2 + ϵ)-Nash equilibrium using O(k.log k/ϵ2) payoff queries, which shows that the ½ barrier for deterministic algorithms can be broken by randomization. For well-supported Nash equilibria (WSNE), we first give a randomized algorithm for finding an ϵ-WSNE of a zero-sum bimatrix game using O(k.log k/ϵ4) payoff queries, and we then use this to obtain a randomized algorithm for finding a (⅔ + ϵ)-WSNE in a general bimatrix game using O(k.log k/ϵ4) payoff queries. Finally, we initiate the study of lower bounds against randomized algorithms in the context of bimatrix games, by showing that randomized algorithms require Ω(k2) payoff queries in order to find an ϵ-Nash equilibrium with ϵ < 1/4k, even in zero-one constant-sum games. In particular, this rules out query-efficient randomized algorithms for finding exact Nash equilibria.

[1]  Troels Bjerre Lund,et al.  Approximate Well-supported Nash Equilibria Below Two-thirds , 2015, Algorithmica.

[2]  John Fearnley,et al.  Distributed Methods for Computing Approximate Equilibria , 2015, Algorithmica.

[3]  Panagiota N. Panagopoulou,et al.  Polynomial algorithms for approximating Nash equilibria of bimatrix games , 2006, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[4]  Amin Saberi,et al.  Approximating nash equilibria using small-support strategies , 2007, EC '07.

[5]  Aviad Rubinstein,et al.  Settling the Complexity of Computing Approximate Two-Player Nash Equilibria , 2016, 2016 IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[6]  I. Althöfer On sparse approximations to randomized strategies and convex combinations , 1994 .

[7]  Rahul Savani,et al.  Polylogarithmic Supports Are Required for Approximate Well-Supported Nash Equilibria below 2/3 , 2013, WINE.

[8]  Aranyak Mehta,et al.  A note on approximate Nash equilibria , 2006, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[9]  Evangelos Markakis,et al.  New algorithms for approximate Nash equilibria in bimatrix games , 2010, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[10]  Aranyak Mehta,et al.  Progress in approximate nash equilibria , 2007, EC '07.

[11]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  Query Complexity of Approximate Equilibria in Anonymous Games , 2015, WINE.

[12]  Yakov Babichenko,et al.  Query complexity of approximate nash equilibria , 2013, STOC.

[13]  Xi Chen,et al.  Well-Supported vs. Approximate Nash Equilibria: Query Complexity of Large Games , 2017, ITCS.

[14]  ConitzerVincent,et al.  The ACM transactions on economics and computation , 2013 .

[15]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  Bounds for the Query Complexity of Approximate Equilibria , 2016, ACM Trans. Economics and Comput..

[16]  Noam Nisan,et al.  The Query Complexity of Correlated Equilibria , 2013, Games Econ. Behav..

[17]  Yakov Babichenko,et al.  Query Complexity of Correlated Equilibrium , 2013, ACM Trans. Economics and Comput..

[18]  Xiaotie Deng,et al.  Settling the complexity of computing two-player Nash equilibria , 2007, JACM.

[19]  Paul G. Spirakis,et al.  An Optimization Approach for Approximate Nash Equilibria , 2007, WINE.

[20]  Paul G. Spirakis,et al.  Well Supported Approximate Equilibria in Bimatrix Games , 2010, Algorithmica.

[21]  Aranyak Mehta,et al.  Playing large games using simple strategies , 2003, EC '03.

[22]  Michael P. Wellman Methods for Empirical Game-Theoretic Analysis , 2006, AAAI.

[23]  Paul W. Goldberg,et al.  Learning equilibria of games via payoff queries , 2013, EC '13.