Towards Incorporating Technology to Enhance the Stereotype Production Method in Warning Symbol Design

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATION Warnings are an important component of hazard control strategies in use in all types of industry. Properly designed warning symbols improve the likelihood that a warning will be recognized and understood, and they may even increase the likelihood that the warning will be heeded. Unfortunately, many commonly used warning symbols are poorly understood and may not meet accepted criteria for comprehension testing. Improving the process by which symbols are developed could affect a variety of future symbol designs. We propose new technological enhancements to traditional warning symbol design strategies—including semantic annotation, mathematical clustering, and evolutionary computation—that may improve the effectiveness of symbols designed in the future. TECHNICALABSTRACT Background:Warning symbols must comm-unicate effectively to a wide range of people. To achieve this goal, two major challenges must be overcome. First, designers must acquire user input while minimizing any unnecessary design input needed from non-users. Second, designers must develop symbols with a high likelihood of communicating effectively to a population of users that may be diverse in culture, language, and country of origin. Purpose: We evaluated clustering algorithms as a means to enhance the judgment required by designers using the stereotype production method for symbol development. Methods: Sixty-six symbol sketches, 35 from U.S. participants and 31 from Indian participants, were evaluated for the warning referent “Hot Exhaust.” A panel of three certified safety professionals semantically annotated the sketches and developed a frequency matrix that associated the presence of graphical attributes with each sketch. Direct clustering and Simple K-Means clustering were performed on the matrix. Results: Mathematical clustering was successful in identifying population stereotypes. The Simple K-Means analysis of the combined nationality matrix produced five clusters, each characterized by a hypothetical centroid symbol analogous to the population stereotypes of the participant group. Only three of the original 35 attributes were contained among these centroids, meaning that the primary differentiators of the population stereotypes were these three primary attributes. Direct clustering found the same three primary attributes—“pipe/stack,” “emission lines,” and “flame.” Further, clustering the nationalities separately revealed that some attributes were universal between the two nationalities, while others seemed to have a culture or country-of-origin sensitivity. Conclusions: Clustering can be used by designers to group sketches into similar families and to identify the attributes of most interest for final symbols. Furthermore, some attributes appear to be “recessive” while others appear to be “dominant” with regard to culture.

[1]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Comprehension of Pictorial Symbols: Effects of Context and Test Method , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Long Liu,et al.  Symbol Comprehension in Different Countries: Experience Gained from Medical Device Area , 2005, Mensch & Computer Workshopband.

[3]  Harm J. Zwaga,et al.  The Development and Standardization of Warning Symbols; the Role of Design and Human Factors , 2000 .

[4]  Annie W. Y. Ng,et al.  Hong Kong Chinese and Korean comprehension of American security safety symbols , 2009 .

[5]  Alan H. S. Chan,et al.  Investigation of the Effectiveness of Traffic Sign Training in Terms of Training Methods and Sign Characteristics , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[6]  Daniel Romer,et al.  Graphic warning labels in cigarette advertisements: recall and viewing patterns. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[7]  Jeremy J. Foster,et al.  International assessment of judged symbol comprehensibility , 2005 .

[8]  Holly E. Hancock,et al.  Safety Symbol Comprehension: Effects of Symbol Type, Familiarity, and Age , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Neil D. Lerner,et al.  SYMBOLS FOR INDUSTRIAL SAFETY , 1982 .

[10]  M. B. Huer.  Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity , 2000 .

[11]  Madhubalan Viswanathan,et al.  Effects of pictorial product-warnings on low-literate consumers , 2012 .

[12]  John Abeysekera,et al.  Understanding small graphical symbols: a cross-cultural study , 2001 .

[13]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A cross-cultural comparison of perceived hazard in response to warning components and configurations: US vs. China. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Kong-King Shieh,et al.  Effects of pictorial size and circle-slash thickness on glance legibility for prohibitive symbols , 2004 .

[15]  Joan Greenbaum,et al.  Small Changes: Starting a Participatory Design Process by Giving Participants a Voice , 2017 .

[16]  T. Davis,et al.  Improving pregnancy drug warnings to promote patient comprehension. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  Adam K. Piper,et al.  Using Hand Drawn Images to Determine Warning Symbol Design Parameters within Interactive Evolutionary Computation Software , 2008 .

[18]  Brian J. Carnahan,et al.  User-Centered Symbol Design Through Human-Computer Collaboration , 2004 .

[19]  Mary F Lesch,et al.  A comparison of two training methods for improving warning symbol comprehension. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  P Green.  DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF SYMBOLS FOR AUTOMOBILE CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS , 1993 .

[21]  Gert R. G. Lanckriet,et al.  A Game-Based Approach for Collecting Semantic Annotations of Music , 2007, ISMIR.

[22]  Shelley Waters Deppa,et al.  Safety Symbols in ANSI and ISO Voluntary Standards - Do People Understand them? , 2006 .

[23]  Brian J. Carnahan,et al.  Using surveys to identify stressors in generalized jobs: A direct clustering method , 2006 .

[24]  Adam Kelly Piper.  Participatory design of warning symbols using distributed interactive evolutionary computation , 2009 .

[25]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Designing Effective Warnings , 2006 .

[26]  Tonya L Smith-Jackson,et al.  Research-based guidelines for warning design and evaluation. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[27]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Introduction to information retrieval , 2008 .

[28]  Yung-Ching Liu,et al.  The effects of age on symbol comprehension in central rail hubs in Taiwan. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[29]  D. A. Milner,et al.  Direct clustering algorithm for group formation in cellular manufacture , 1982 .

[30]  Levent Burak Kara,et al.  An image-based, trainable symbol recognizer for hand-drawn sketches , 2005, Comput. Graph..

[31]  Jerry Davis,et al.  Testing the Effects of Label Deterioration on the Legibility and Comprehensibility of Warnings , 2003 .

[32]  Kin Wai Michael Siu,et al.  The effects of user factors and symbol referents on public symbol design using the stereotype production method. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[33]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[34]  E. L. Ringseis,et al.  The Comprehensibility and Legibility of Twenty Pharmaceutical Warning Pictograms , 1995 .

[35]  Keyla Friedmann,et al.  The effect of adding symbols to written warning labels on user behavior and recall , 1988 .

[36]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Pharmaceutical container labels: enhancing preference perceptions with alternative designs and pictorials , 1996 .

[37]  Kent P. Vaubel,et al.  The Noticeability of Warnings on Alcoholic Beverage Containers , 1993 .

[38]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Supervised Learning of Semantic Classes for Image Annotation and Retrieval , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[39]  Mary F Lesch,et al.  Warning symbols as reminders of hazards: impact of training. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[40]  Adnan Yazici,et al.  A semi-automatic text-based semantic video annotation system for Turkish facilitating multilingual retrieval , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[41]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  A three-stage model summarizes product warning and environmental sign research , 2014 .

[42]  David B. Boles,et al.  The Effect of Symbols on Warning Compliance , 1990 .

[43]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[44]  William F. Moroney,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Automobile Symbols: The Focus Group Approach , 1994 .

[45]  Neil D. Lerner,et al.  Assessment of Fire-Safety Symbols , 1982 .

[46]  Tina Brunetti Sayer.  The Development and Evaluation of Icons for Side Obstacle Warning Systems , 2002 .

[47]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Introduction to Information Retrieval , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[48]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Warning Research: An Integrative Perspective , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[49]  Michael S. Wogalter,et al.  Handbook of Warnings , 2006 .

[50]  Karine Gallopel-Morvan,et al.  The use of visual warnings in social marketing: The case of tobacco , 2011 .

[51]  Alan H. S. Chan,et al.  Warning Design: A Research Prospective , 1999 .

[52]  Chi Ming Tam,et al.  Relationship between construction safety signs and symbols recognition and characteristics of construction personnel , 2003 .

[53]  Alan H S Chan,et al.  The guessability of traffic signs: effects of prospective-user factors and sign design features. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[54]  Kin Wai Michael Siu,et al.  Perspectives toward the stereotype production method for public symbol design: a case study of novice designers. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[55]  Elizabeth Murphy,et al.  A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: a case study from an industry perspective. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.