Steady state reliability of maximum power point tracking algorithms used with a thermoelectric generator

A thermoelectric generator (TEG) with its near linear V-I characteristic makes its operation distinct from a photovoltaic (PV) cell. However, when maximum power point tracking (MPPT) is implemented in TEG power electronic systems, the established knowledge and wisdom surrounding PV oriented MPPT systems is often applied directly without consideration of the TEG's characteristics. Unsuitable MPPT algorithms generate large operating point variations thus deteriorating the steady state performance of the TEG. Therefore an algorithm that can reliably deliver power with low steady state error over a range of operating conditions is desired. This paper compares three common MPPT methods (perturb and observe, power gradient tracking and fractional open-circuit voltage / short-circuit current), in terms of their steady state performance and reliability, when used with a 4.2 V, 3.4 A (for matched load at ΔT = 270°C) TEG module. Experimental results are reported that confirm better and more reliable steady state performance of the fractional open-circuit voltage / short-circuit current method compared to the perturb and observe and power gradient tracking algorithms.

[1]  Sang-Hyun Cho,et al.  A 550µW 10b 40MS/s SAR ADC with multistep addition-only digital error correction , 2010, IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference 2010.

[2]  Rae-Young Kim,et al.  Analysis and Design of Maximum Power Point Tracking Scheme for Thermoelectric Battery Energy Storage System , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Sungkyu Cho,et al.  A coreless maximum power point tracking circuit of thermoelectric generators for battery charging systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference.

[4]  Paul Knauer,et al.  Automatic Impedance Matching in DC Circuits , 1966, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[5]  Peter Spies,et al.  ANALOG MAXIMUM POWER POINT CIRCUIT APPLIED TO THERMOGENERATORS , 2008 .

[6]  H. Nagayoshi,et al.  Comparison of maximum power point control methods for thermoelectric power generator , 2002, Twenty-First International Conference on Thermoelectrics, 2002. Proceedings ICT '02..

[7]  Jensak Eakburanawat,et al.  Development of a thermoelectric battery-charger with microcontroller-based maximum power point tracking technique , 2006 .

[8]  P.L. Chapman,et al.  Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[9]  Wenlong Li,et al.  Thermoelectric power generation with maximum power point tracking , 2009 .

[10]  H. Nagayoshi,et al.  Mismatch Power Loss Reduction on Thermoelectric Generator Systems Using Maximum Power Point Trackers , 2006, 2006 25th International Conference on Thermoelectrics.

[11]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Thermoelectrics: a review of present and potential applications , 2003 .

[12]  V.G. Agelidis,et al.  Comparative study of maximum power point tracking algorithms for thermoelectric generators , 2008, 2008 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference.