Are single-phase flow numerical models sufficient to estimate pressure distribution in CO2 sequestration projects?

Abstract As CO 2 is injected into a deep saline aquifer, three regions develop: A “drying” region next to the well in which CO 2 injectate occupies 100% of the pore space, a brine region away from the injection well in which 100% of the pores are saturated with brine, and a two-phase region in which water and CO 2 coexist. Several papers describe the speeds at which those two fronts progress outward using the Buckley-Leverett fractional flow (BLFF) theory. Next to a CO 2 injection well and at early times, compositional flow theory must be implemented. It is also understood that far from the injection site, where only slight pressure elevation is felt, a single phase flow approach is sufficient because all the complexities of compositional flow could be neglected. However regulators may be wary of complex models and of the associated black box syndrome and rather may favor the simpler single-phase flow approach. This paper investigates using single-phase flow numerical models to describe compositional flow processes. Previous work already showed that results from the CMG-GEM and MODFLOW numerical codes are very similar away from the injection zone given some minor modifications in the input file of the single-phase flow code. We present a more thorough scoping analysis aiming at establishing the proposition that single-phase flow models (CMG-IMEX), given some simple treatment, can predict pressure increase as well as more complex compositional flow models (CMG-GEM).

[1]  McMillan Burton,et al.  Time-Dependent Injectivity During CO2 Storage in Aquifers , 2008 .

[2]  S. Hosseini,et al.  Sensitivity study of CO2 storage in saline aquifers in the presence of a gas cap , 2011 .

[3]  Kenzi Karasaki,et al.  Numerical investigation for the impact of CO2 geologic sequestration on regional groundwater flow , 2009 .

[4]  Jan M Nordbotten,et al.  Practical Modeling Approaches for Geological Storage of Carbon Dioxide , 2009, Ground water.

[5]  Jean-Philippe Nicot,et al.  Evaluation of large-scale CO2 storage on fresh-water sections of aquifers: An example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin , 2008 .

[6]  M. A. Hessea,et al.  Gravity Currents with Residual Trapping , 2009 .

[7]  Robert W. Zimmerman,et al.  Approximate Solutions for Pressure Buildup During CO2 Injection in Brine Aquifers , 2009 .

[8]  Jan M. Nordbotten,et al.  Similarity solutions for fluid injection into confined aquifers , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  Jan M. Nordbotten,et al.  Injection and Storage of CO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers: Analytical Solution for CO2 Plume Evolution During Injection , 2005 .

[10]  J. Nicot,et al.  Investigation of water displacement following large CO2 sequestration operations , 2009 .

[11]  J. Nicot Pressure perturbations from geologic carbon sequestration: Area-of-review boundaries and borehole leakage driving forces , 2009 .

[12]  J. Birkholzer,et al.  Basin-scale hydrogeologic impacts of CO2 storage: Capacity and regulatory implications , 2009 .

[13]  Hamdi A. Tchelepi,et al.  Gravity currents with residual trapping , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Carl W. Gable,et al.  Assessment of basin-scale hydrologic impacts of CO2 sequestration, Illinois basin , 2010 .

[15]  R. Juanes,et al.  The Footprint of the CO[subscript 2] Plume during Carbon Dioxide Storage in Saline Aquifers: Storage Efficiency for Capillary Trapping at the Basin Scale , 2009 .